Skip to main content

Support the Independence at Home Act

If you are interested in advocating for improved care for patients with multiple chronic illnesses, or just fed up with how care is delivered for the most frail, vulnerable, and costly Medicare beneficiaries, it's time to act. Congress has in it's lap the Independence at Home Act of 2009. This act amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize voluntary home care coordination pilot programs for high-cost Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.

These pilot programs would focus on beneficiaries with two or more specified high cost chronic illnesses that have utilized certain Medicare benefits in the past 12 months, and that have an inability to perform two or more ADLs. The pilot programs will put together a team that consists of health care professionals directed by a qualified IAH physician or nurse practitioner who coordinates health care across all treatment settings. Best of all these programs will pay for themselves out of the gate because they must meet three performance standards including

o Minimum savings of 5% per year;
o Outcomes appropriate for the beneficiary’s condition; and
o Patient satisfaction.

It's time to improve the coordination of care we give to patients with multiple comorbid conditions, and to promote independent living. Check out http://www.aahcp.org/iahsummary.pdf or an article on CNN to learn more – or get out there and write your sentor!

Comments

Alex Smith said…
Terrific post Eric!

Here's a draft email (templated by Helen Kao) I sent to Senator Feinstein about this issue. Readers -- feel free to adapt this to email your congressperson about this critical issue!

June 12, 2009

Dear Senator Feinstein;

As one of your constituents, I strongly encourage you to support the Independence at Home Act (HR 2560, S 1131) which was re-introduced May 21, 2009. This legislation has bipartisan support in both chambers, pays for itself out of the gate, saves money, and improves care for the most frail, vulnerable, and costly Medicare beneficiaries.

The model is based on technology-enabled home visits by an interdisciplinary team led by physicians and nurse practitioners, and includes electronic health records as part of the mandated process. The financing employs a combination of existing fee-for-service payments plus shared savings after demonstrating value returned. There is mounting evidence that this care model is highly effective. The Act leaves the main elements of Medicare in place, requires little capitalization for the new programs, provides freedom of choice for beneficiaries, and thus will be readily implemented. There are practices across the country, including in our state that are capable of this model of care and are ready to move forward. For a current example, see the recent CNN story at: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/25/hm.doctor.house.call/

By directly engaging medical care teams, the Independence at Home (IAH) Act corrects a key weakness that has historically limited the effectiveness of Part A home health care services, and it addresses Transitional Care. For these frail, poorly mobile patients who have difficulty accessing office-based care, IAH is a better plan than the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) and will be complementary to PCMH efforts. By paying for itself out of the gate, Independence at Home is unique among current legislative proposals. IAH will stimulate growth of a badly needed geriatric workforce, and most importantly IAH will provide the medical care that people want and need, when they want it, and where they want it.

The Independence at Home Act calls for a 3-year pilot phase in multiple states, followed by national roll-out if the initial efforts are successful based on independent evaluation.

26 organizations have signed on to endorse IAH, including AARP, Family Caregiver Alliance, and the Alzheimer’s Association.

Bipartisan support in both houses is growing, with the recent addition of Senators Kennedy and Mikulski, joining Wyden who introduced the Senate version and Burr, plus Cardin and Whitehouse.

Your timely support (this week) for this bill (HR 2560, S 1131) will be a great help toward advancing this forward-thinking proposal for Medicare reform.

Sincerely,
Alexander K. Smith
Thanks for the information about this. I'm wondering if mental health issues - depression, bipolar, schizophrenia - are being considered chronic conditions under this proposed legislation. Individuals with serious mental health issues many of whom have Medicare have significantly lower life expectancies than the national average and a high prevalence of co-morbid conditions. It might be worth exploring applicability of the legislation to this population and you may be able to broaden its support.
Eric Widera said…
TO be eligible for the pilot studies one needs to have functional impairment and have 2 or more of the following chronic conditions: Congestive heart failure, Diabetes, COPD, Ischemic heart disease, Peripheral arterial disease, Stroke, Dementia, Pressure ulcers, Hypertension, Neurodegenerative diseases, and "Any other chronic condition that the Secretary identifies as likely to result in high costs to the program". I'm not sure if significant mental health issues would fall in the last condition.
ERubin MD said…
Mental health conditions (mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, dementia) are common among the homebound, particularly the homebound elderly. These psychiatric disorders often interact with comorbid medical conditions and can greatly influence understanding/adherence to medical recommendations. As a psychiatrist who treats homebound elderly patients with mental illness (and invariably a host of chronic physical disorders), liaison with primary care and other medical providers is a major part of what I do. It would be poor medical treatment indeed to omit the treatment of mental disorders while trying to promote independence at home.
Anonymous said…
Hi, rebzya, this my first post cvxcbxvcbed idvdq
[url=http://transworld.net/author/codeine/]codeine online[/url]
http://transworld.net/author/codeine/

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…