Skip to main content

Support the Independence at Home Act

If you are interested in advocating for improved care for patients with multiple chronic illnesses, or just fed up with how care is delivered for the most frail, vulnerable, and costly Medicare beneficiaries, it's time to act. Congress has in it's lap the Independence at Home Act of 2009. This act amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize voluntary home care coordination pilot programs for high-cost Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.

These pilot programs would focus on beneficiaries with two or more specified high cost chronic illnesses that have utilized certain Medicare benefits in the past 12 months, and that have an inability to perform two or more ADLs. The pilot programs will put together a team that consists of health care professionals directed by a qualified IAH physician or nurse practitioner who coordinates health care across all treatment settings. Best of all these programs will pay for themselves out of the gate because they must meet three performance standards including

o Minimum savings of 5% per year;
o Outcomes appropriate for the beneficiary’s condition; and
o Patient satisfaction.

It's time to improve the coordination of care we give to patients with multiple comorbid conditions, and to promote independent living. Check out http://www.aahcp.org/iahsummary.pdf or an article on CNN to learn more – or get out there and write your sentor!

Comments

Alex Smith said…
Terrific post Eric!

Here's a draft email (templated by Helen Kao) I sent to Senator Feinstein about this issue. Readers -- feel free to adapt this to email your congressperson about this critical issue!

June 12, 2009

Dear Senator Feinstein;

As one of your constituents, I strongly encourage you to support the Independence at Home Act (HR 2560, S 1131) which was re-introduced May 21, 2009. This legislation has bipartisan support in both chambers, pays for itself out of the gate, saves money, and improves care for the most frail, vulnerable, and costly Medicare beneficiaries.

The model is based on technology-enabled home visits by an interdisciplinary team led by physicians and nurse practitioners, and includes electronic health records as part of the mandated process. The financing employs a combination of existing fee-for-service payments plus shared savings after demonstrating value returned. There is mounting evidence that this care model is highly effective. The Act leaves the main elements of Medicare in place, requires little capitalization for the new programs, provides freedom of choice for beneficiaries, and thus will be readily implemented. There are practices across the country, including in our state that are capable of this model of care and are ready to move forward. For a current example, see the recent CNN story at: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/25/hm.doctor.house.call/

By directly engaging medical care teams, the Independence at Home (IAH) Act corrects a key weakness that has historically limited the effectiveness of Part A home health care services, and it addresses Transitional Care. For these frail, poorly mobile patients who have difficulty accessing office-based care, IAH is a better plan than the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) and will be complementary to PCMH efforts. By paying for itself out of the gate, Independence at Home is unique among current legislative proposals. IAH will stimulate growth of a badly needed geriatric workforce, and most importantly IAH will provide the medical care that people want and need, when they want it, and where they want it.

The Independence at Home Act calls for a 3-year pilot phase in multiple states, followed by national roll-out if the initial efforts are successful based on independent evaluation.

26 organizations have signed on to endorse IAH, including AARP, Family Caregiver Alliance, and the Alzheimer’s Association.

Bipartisan support in both houses is growing, with the recent addition of Senators Kennedy and Mikulski, joining Wyden who introduced the Senate version and Burr, plus Cardin and Whitehouse.

Your timely support (this week) for this bill (HR 2560, S 1131) will be a great help toward advancing this forward-thinking proposal for Medicare reform.

Sincerely,
Alexander K. Smith
Thanks for the information about this. I'm wondering if mental health issues - depression, bipolar, schizophrenia - are being considered chronic conditions under this proposed legislation. Individuals with serious mental health issues many of whom have Medicare have significantly lower life expectancies than the national average and a high prevalence of co-morbid conditions. It might be worth exploring applicability of the legislation to this population and you may be able to broaden its support.
Eric Widera said…
TO be eligible for the pilot studies one needs to have functional impairment and have 2 or more of the following chronic conditions: Congestive heart failure, Diabetes, COPD, Ischemic heart disease, Peripheral arterial disease, Stroke, Dementia, Pressure ulcers, Hypertension, Neurodegenerative diseases, and "Any other chronic condition that the Secretary identifies as likely to result in high costs to the program". I'm not sure if significant mental health issues would fall in the last condition.
ERubin MD said…
Mental health conditions (mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, dementia) are common among the homebound, particularly the homebound elderly. These psychiatric disorders often interact with comorbid medical conditions and can greatly influence understanding/adherence to medical recommendations. As a psychiatrist who treats homebound elderly patients with mental illness (and invariably a host of chronic physical disorders), liaison with primary care and other medical providers is a major part of what I do. It would be poor medical treatment indeed to omit the treatment of mental disorders while trying to promote independence at home.
Anonymous said…
Hi, rebzya, this my first post cvxcbxvcbed idvdq
[url=http://transworld.net/author/codeine/]codeine online[/url]
http://transworld.net/author/codeine/

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…