Skip to main content

“Moribund Obesity”: Palliative care diagnosis or poorly chosen label?


I’ve always had a fascination with how certain phrases influence practice and how established terms frame and reinforce provider attitudes toward the individuals they care for. I recently began exploring the experience of nursing home life among obese residents, and in a literature search came across Deepak Gupta’s letter the editor “Moribund Obesity as a Palliative Care Diagnosis.” Now, add to my list of questionable palliative care related diagnoses (presently including: psychogenic mortality, failure to thrive, organic brain disease, et al.) the newly coined “moribund obesity.” At the risk of oversimplifying, a morbidly obese individual achieves moribund status when usual interventions to reduce or control obesity fail as a result of some insurmountable barrier or collection of barriers—physical, psychological, social or spiritual. Most distressing in the article, suggested spiritual barriers include “inadequate self-control and the spiritual pain that comes from feeling worthless or abandoned by God.” I don’t know why, but I bristled when I read this. Perhaps it’s my reading a “blame the victim” subtext into this, or perhaps it’s that this seems to downplay the complexity of overeating, and emerging science suggesting neuro-physiological processes that may parallel addiction.

The adjective “moribund” runs the risk of becoming a “line in the sand”, defining when palliative care becomes appropriate. In the most extreme scenario the “moribund obese” label becomes the green-light for palliative intervention and discontinuation of other therapies. In addition, we risk overlooking the need for palliative intervention periodically or continuously across the course of a refractory chronic condition. In the case of obesity, this may be long before the morbidly obese individual satisfies criteria to earn the “moribund obese” label.

In all fairness, the tenor of Gupta’s commentary suggests a call to recognize the complexity of chronic refractory obesity and the need for palliative intervention. The reality is that most of our knowledge about the palliative care needs in morbidly obese individuals is based on anecdote. There are few studies that have documented the range of their palliative care needs or provided direction for comprehensive intervention. Complex, long standing, multifactorial conditions with poorly understood etiologies are often the most challenging to manage. They are often characterized by good days and bad days, by periods of remission and exacerbation—some explained, some not. We often attempt to capture these conditions using imprecise terms (e.g. failure to thrive) which may satisfy the need to diagnose but often result in suspending additional assessments vital to an effective palliative care plan. I am not sure that inventing a new term (moribund obesity) that attempts to capture when someone has crossed an ill defined line on the way to mortality is helpful. In the end such classification may have the undesired effect of relegating a sub-population of complex, chronically obese individuals to a palliative “island of misfit toys.” Perhaps a better tack is to banish “moribund obesity” to the “island of misfit terms.”

Comments

GGM said…
I am confused as to Dr. Gupta's reasoning in coining this new term, "moribund obesity." Obesity is a risk factor for many other problems and conditions, and therefore cannot in itself be a palliative care diagnosis. Even the author's own example of pulmonary embolism being directly due to obesity is false. Obesity increases the *risk* of PE, just like it increases the risk of OSA, or diabetes. The author's own anecdote, of an obese man with chronic recurring cellulitis could just as easily be about an average-sized man with the same medical problems with chronic cellulitis.

I think the article misses the point. How can obesity be a palliative care diagnosis when it is not even a diagnosis that causes any problems in and of itself? It's like calling "old age" a palliative care diagnosis.
Alex Smith said…
Moribund - from Marion Webster's Dictionary:
1: being in the state of dying : approaching death
2: being in a state of inactivity or obsolescence
Ok, so perhaps both apply to some obese patients. The major issue I have with this term is the emphasis on lack of curative options as a criteria for palliative care. This is the model of palliative care, tied to hospice and it's requirements of a limited prognosis. The other issue I have is with the term "palliative care diagnosis." What is that? Is pancreatic cancer a palliative care diagnosis? Certainly, it is an illness where palliative concerns predominate, but I'm not sure what the author meant by palliative care diagnosis. I think he is trying to define "palliative diagnoses" as conditions for which curative treatment options are no longer available...again raising my concern addressed above. Palliative care can and in many cases should be delivered in conjunction with life-prolonging care, not defined in opposition to it.
Dan Matlock said…
Alex, your points are right on!

This article makes me think about a hospice case that still haunts me. The case was a 31 yo anorexic woman who had been fired from all the treatment programs in Denver ('manipulative' blah, blah, blah). When I saw her in hospice, she was begging for a bisacodyl PR. On one hand, I wanted to respect her wishes, on the other, I didn't want to support this dreadful disease. I remember thinking helplessly to myself 'all you have to do is eat.' but it is much more complicated than that. She died, peacefully, at the age or 31, from a completely reversible process. As society continues to expand at the waist, we will likely be faced with cases of obesity where similar feelings arise. 'All you have to do is lose weight.'

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …