Skip to main content

“Moribund Obesity”: Palliative care diagnosis or poorly chosen label?


I’ve always had a fascination with how certain phrases influence practice and how established terms frame and reinforce provider attitudes toward the individuals they care for. I recently began exploring the experience of nursing home life among obese residents, and in a literature search came across Deepak Gupta’s letter the editor “Moribund Obesity as a Palliative Care Diagnosis.” Now, add to my list of questionable palliative care related diagnoses (presently including: psychogenic mortality, failure to thrive, organic brain disease, et al.) the newly coined “moribund obesity.” At the risk of oversimplifying, a morbidly obese individual achieves moribund status when usual interventions to reduce or control obesity fail as a result of some insurmountable barrier or collection of barriers—physical, psychological, social or spiritual. Most distressing in the article, suggested spiritual barriers include “inadequate self-control and the spiritual pain that comes from feeling worthless or abandoned by God.” I don’t know why, but I bristled when I read this. Perhaps it’s my reading a “blame the victim” subtext into this, or perhaps it’s that this seems to downplay the complexity of overeating, and emerging science suggesting neuro-physiological processes that may parallel addiction.

The adjective “moribund” runs the risk of becoming a “line in the sand”, defining when palliative care becomes appropriate. In the most extreme scenario the “moribund obese” label becomes the green-light for palliative intervention and discontinuation of other therapies. In addition, we risk overlooking the need for palliative intervention periodically or continuously across the course of a refractory chronic condition. In the case of obesity, this may be long before the morbidly obese individual satisfies criteria to earn the “moribund obese” label.

In all fairness, the tenor of Gupta’s commentary suggests a call to recognize the complexity of chronic refractory obesity and the need for palliative intervention. The reality is that most of our knowledge about the palliative care needs in morbidly obese individuals is based on anecdote. There are few studies that have documented the range of their palliative care needs or provided direction for comprehensive intervention. Complex, long standing, multifactorial conditions with poorly understood etiologies are often the most challenging to manage. They are often characterized by good days and bad days, by periods of remission and exacerbation—some explained, some not. We often attempt to capture these conditions using imprecise terms (e.g. failure to thrive) which may satisfy the need to diagnose but often result in suspending additional assessments vital to an effective palliative care plan. I am not sure that inventing a new term (moribund obesity) that attempts to capture when someone has crossed an ill defined line on the way to mortality is helpful. In the end such classification may have the undesired effect of relegating a sub-population of complex, chronically obese individuals to a palliative “island of misfit toys.” Perhaps a better tack is to banish “moribund obesity” to the “island of misfit terms.”

Comments

GGM said…
I am confused as to Dr. Gupta's reasoning in coining this new term, "moribund obesity." Obesity is a risk factor for many other problems and conditions, and therefore cannot in itself be a palliative care diagnosis. Even the author's own example of pulmonary embolism being directly due to obesity is false. Obesity increases the *risk* of PE, just like it increases the risk of OSA, or diabetes. The author's own anecdote, of an obese man with chronic recurring cellulitis could just as easily be about an average-sized man with the same medical problems with chronic cellulitis.

I think the article misses the point. How can obesity be a palliative care diagnosis when it is not even a diagnosis that causes any problems in and of itself? It's like calling "old age" a palliative care diagnosis.
Alex Smith said…
Moribund - from Marion Webster's Dictionary:
1: being in the state of dying : approaching death
2: being in a state of inactivity or obsolescence
Ok, so perhaps both apply to some obese patients. The major issue I have with this term is the emphasis on lack of curative options as a criteria for palliative care. This is the model of palliative care, tied to hospice and it's requirements of a limited prognosis. The other issue I have is with the term "palliative care diagnosis." What is that? Is pancreatic cancer a palliative care diagnosis? Certainly, it is an illness where palliative concerns predominate, but I'm not sure what the author meant by palliative care diagnosis. I think he is trying to define "palliative diagnoses" as conditions for which curative treatment options are no longer available...again raising my concern addressed above. Palliative care can and in many cases should be delivered in conjunction with life-prolonging care, not defined in opposition to it.
Dan Matlock said…
Alex, your points are right on!

This article makes me think about a hospice case that still haunts me. The case was a 31 yo anorexic woman who had been fired from all the treatment programs in Denver ('manipulative' blah, blah, blah). When I saw her in hospice, she was begging for a bisacodyl PR. On one hand, I wanted to respect her wishes, on the other, I didn't want to support this dreadful disease. I remember thinking helplessly to myself 'all you have to do is eat.' but it is much more complicated than that. She died, peacefully, at the age or 31, from a completely reversible process. As society continues to expand at the waist, we will likely be faced with cases of obesity where similar feelings arise. 'All you have to do is lose weight.'

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …