Skip to main content

An Attempt to Balance the Signal-Noise Ratio Surrounding Palliative Care

While it has taken years to popularize the word "palliative" (I have to confess that the word still does not roll nicely off my accented tongue), it is remarkable how the recent negative press related to the issues addressed in the Newsweek article on rethinking end of life care have managed to gain significant traction swiftly. I worry that all this sensationalism will distract from real and important discourse on sensitive topics like exploring the underlying suffering beneath patients' requests for hastening death. On a related note, Dr. Susan Block from Harvard Medical School has authored a very timely video module entitled : Patient Requests to Manage Life's Final Chapter: Assessment and Palliation. The module is hosted on a Stanford curricular LMS, please note that you have to register and sign up to get access to it (takes 2 business days) . On a positive note, the module is free full text and has a interactive video case study intertwined into the module, pre and post test video questions. See below for sample clip:
Case study: The clip above is about Emily, a 56 year old dancer with advanced ovarian cancer s/p multiple rounds of chemo with minimal response. After struggling with multiple distressing symptoms due to the cancer and the treatments for almost three years, Emily decides to stop chemotherapy. Her oncologist, Dr. Stevenson (played by the extremely talented oncologist, Dr. Beth Martin, from Stanford), wants to start Emily on a promising experimental chemotherapy agent. However, Emily just stops coming to her Oncology appointments and instead writes a letter to Dr. Stevenson asking for help with hastening her end. Dr. Stevenson, who totally did not see this coming, is taken aback and reaches out to her colleague and palliative care expert, Dr. Susan Block. Check out the video clip above to see a conversation between Dr. Stevenson and Dr. Block (played by the extremely talented Dr. Susan Block from Harvard).
Case study credits: Case written, directed and produced by VJ Periyakoil, MD.All characters ( except Dr. Block's character) appearing in this case study are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Comments

Patrice Villars said…
This video is a beautiful example of the type of caring and communication we all strive to achieve. Without using a direct patient interaction, we see how Dr. Block compassionately addresses both the emotional component of the oncologist's response and opens her to the possibility that the patient may have more going with her psychologically/spiritually than her cancer treatment addresses. THIS is what palliative truly is. It's not about dying or a particular agenda for care. It's about seeing the whole picture....individually, fully, and compassionately. So, yes, let's get THIS message out to the media, to our colleagues, and to our patients/families. Thank you for this post.
VJ Periyakoil said…
Folks:
Just for clarity, in the actual module, there are examples of multiple patient interaction between the patient, her husband, her daughter, Emily's friend Katie ( a Nurse) and Drs. Block and Stevenson ( played by Dr. Beth module). There is a meeting between Emily and her doctors when Dr. Block beautifully demonstrates exactly how have a end of life care plan meeting with a patient who is clearly suffering tremendously.
Alex Smith said…
Enjoyed the video, VJ. Always inspiring to see Susan Block "in action." I registered at the site - couple of glitches registering that I left some feedback about. Looking forward to seeing the videos. I hope to use these as teaching tools.
Dan Matlock said…
Dr. Block definitely modeled good communication. While I hope I succeed, I do find that I have to actively manage and suppress my frustration with specialists who want to push their agendas onto patients. A particular challenge of palliative care.

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  


You can also find us on Youtube!


Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes…

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…