Skip to main content

Healthy People 2020: Your input is needed

Healthy People 2020: Your input is needed!

Every 10 years, The US Government produces Healthy People, a statement of the Public Health Goals for the Nation. The Healty People document becomes very influential, and is considered by policy makers and funders. For the first time ever, there is a concerted effort to directly address Geriatric Issues in Healthy People. The Geriatrics and Palliative Care communities need to do all they can to assure that the final report of Healthy People 2020 fully bears the fruit of this effort.

A draft of Healthy People 2020 is now available for public comment. Your comments can influence the final Healthy People 2020 statement of US Public Health Goals. It is important Geriatrics and Palliative Care providers help shape Healthy People 2020.

In the past, health goals for the elderly played a minimal role in Healthy People. For the first time, Healthy People 2020 includes a section devoted to health objectives for older adults. Amy Berman, Program Officer at the John A Hartford Foundation, and others on the Older Adults Workgroup within Healthy People 2020 helped lobby for more attention to the needs of older persons in Healthy People.

The draft is an important advance over previous versions of Healthy People. However, the document can go further in advancing the health of older adults. For example, there is no goal focused on caregiver depression. Also, there is not much focus on symptoms and disease related suffering. Therefore, the input of palliative care experts could be particularly helpful .

To comment, first go the HP2020 comments section and register. You can go to this page to see the list of topic areas. Click here to see older adult health objectives. You can then post comments on any goal, such as suggestions for more specificity, better measures, etc. You can also suggest additional objectives. You will be asked to describe the objective, give a rationale, and suggest a datasource that could be used to measure the objective. While in this post, I have focused on the older adult objectives, it may be useful to comment in other topic areas as well. For example, while the cancer topic area includes a new objective related to cancer survivorship, it has nothing on palliative care for cancer patients.

This may be an important opportunity for the Geriatrics and Palliative Care communities to influence an important public health initiative.


Alex Smith said…
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Ken. I noticed 3palliative care related proposed objectives under "Quality of Life and Well Being." These are related to advance care planning and hospice access (NHPCO proposed one).

There are no planned or proposed objectives relating to palliative care under cancer.

Many of the planned/proposed objectives under "Older Adults" also would fall under the umbrella of palliative care (e.g. reduced depressive symptoms among caregivers of persons with dementia).

I signed up under the organization name "GeriPal: A Geriatrics and Palliative Care Blog." What should we propose? Or what proposals should we make? Something about increased attention to the palliative needs of the elderly, I think.
Eric Widera said…
Alex - a couple of thoughts for GeriPal comments:

1. Disability and Seconday Conditions Objective - DSC HP2020–16: Reduce the proportion of older adults with disabilities who use inappropriate medications.

Why limit this to only older adults with disability? Seems like we should be following the Beers Criteria which recommends avoiding a list of inappropriate medications for all older adults.

2. Cancer Objective: interesting how the sole focus seems to be on decreasing death rates and not so much on improving the quality of life or the symptom severity of those with cancer. I guess that may go into the empty "Quality of Life and Well-Being" objective. (oh, wait - pain is addressed in the "Medical Product Safety" objective - good place to store that one)

3. What about "Increase the proportion of the health care workforce with palliative care certification"???
Dan Matlock said…
This is important!

While discussing HP 2010 during my MPH courses, I asked: "when public health has done all it can, what will the 10 leading causes of death be?" The professor didn't like the question at all and she definitely had no response. In my mind, this public health philosophy of preventing death is one of the main reasons why palliative care struggles. Until definitions of "health" include some discussion of "health in dying," (whatever that is) palliative care will remain absent from these documents and the public health agenda.

That said, while the "older people" section of HP 2020 is thin, it marks is a huge leap forward.

Perhaps one tactic:

1) All of us should comment all over the older adults section with the goal of expanding it - note: metric are important as a key of HP 2020 is that they want to be able to measure a change come 2020.

2) Push palliative care into cancer (as Eric suggested). One way to do this is to comment extensively under this objective: "(Developmental) Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who report physical health-related quality of life similar to the general population." Beyond HRQOL, we could propose metrics such as % reporting that their pain was addressed, % reporting that they had designated a proxy decision maker or written a living will, or, if we really want to go big, % dying in hospice.

Thanks for orgainzing this. I will forward this around locally.
Alex Smith said…
I added a proposal under quality of life. Unfortunately, the source for my comment is anonymous. I logged in correctly, but I think I took too long to write my proposal, and the system logged me out! least it's posted.

Under "Quality of Life and Well-Being"

Objective: Increase the proportion of the health care workforce with palliative care certification.
a. Physicians
b. Nurses
c. Social workers

Rationale: Palliative care should be offered to improve the quality of life of all seriously ill patients. Patients with symptoms that are difficult to treat or who face challenging goals of care discussions may benifit most from palliative care. Palliative efforts to enhance quality of life should be offered alongside curative and/or restorative medical care. Over the next several decades the greatest growth in the need for palliative care services will occur among older adults (see Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce, National Academies Press 2008). Regardless of age, however, all patients living with serious illness and their family caregivers are likely to experience improvements in quality of life from increased availability of palliative care services (see Lorenz Annals of Internal Medicine, 2008;148(2):147-159) . In addition to established improvements in quality of life, palliative care consult services save money (see Morrison Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1783-1790). For more in depth justification, please see the following websites: GeriPal: A Geriatrics and Palliative Care Blog (; The Center to Advance Palliative Care (; and the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Care (

Data Sources: American Boards of Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology, Family Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Neurology, Surgery, Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine, Radiology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology; American Osteopathic Association Bureau of Osteopathic Specialists; American Nurses Credentialing Center; National Association of Social Workers.
ken covinsky said…
Many great comments here. Of note, I would not refrain from commenting or recommending a new objective just because someone else has already made a similar recommendation. Perhaps repeat comments or recommendations will support a sense that there is a larger constituency supporting an objective.
Adult Day Care said…
i am very much agree with ur valuable post, everyone should have knowledge abt how to take care of adult ppl and have awareness of right medication for them, how to overcome their loneliness etc,Although care providers are doing well in this regard,but in my opinion everyone should learn. ur post is working as an informative source for all. Thanx
<a href=">adult day care</a>

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  

You can also find us on Youtube!

Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…