Skip to main content

Driving and Dementia: An Excellent Guideline, and A Missed Opportunity


The American Academy of Neurologyrecently released a very useful guideline on the evaluation of driving risk in patients with dementia. This very nicely written, evidence-based guideline is one of the best articles I have read on this subject. It should be required reading for all who care for patients with dementia. By sponsoring this informative guideline, the AAN will help physicians, caregivers, and patients protect the public health by providing guidance as to when a driving by a cognitively impaired patient is unsafe.

However, an important role of professional societies is to serve as advocates for their patients. I wish the AAN had leveraged the release of this guideline to strongly advocate for their patients with dementia.
First, some details about the guideline. The authors conducted an extensive literature review to determine what characteristics differentiate between cognitively impaired patients who can or can not drive safely. As a matter of public safety, it is important that driving cease when it becomes unsafe. However, a number of studies suggest that patients with just mild cognitive impairment can still drive safely. Here are the key findings:

  • The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale is useful in determing who can safely drive. The CDR integrates information from caregivers and clinical observation. The paper has a useful table that shows how to use the scale. Some mildly impaired patients can still safely drive. Mild impairment generally means the patient is fully oriented, and independent in all self-care activities

  • If the caregivers are concerned about the patients driving, they are probably right. The patient's degree of confidence in their driving ability is not very helpful.

  • Some aspects of the driving history suggest driving may be unsafe. This includes traffic citations, reduced driving, and self-reported situational avoidance.
But while everyone would agree that a cognitively impaired unsafe driver should be off the road, we sometimes gloss over how devastating taking away the keys can be. There is a tendency to suggest patients find alternative means of transportation, even though we are fully aware that for many patients, there is no alternative. Loss of driving privileges will often lead to isolation, an impaired quality of life, and depression. Our aging unfriendly world is often not kind to people who can no longer drive. We provide them no alternative transportation options, and offer little in the way of supportive services that will help them stay socially engaged after they stop driving.

So, I wish the AAN press release announcing this guideline had expressed some sense of outrage about the lack of societal support for elders who have to give up driving. I wish they had noted that there is a societal obligation to do more than yank drivers licenses. Shouldn't the revocation of a drivers license be accompanied by a committment of transportation assistance? Perhaps it would be better if discussions about license revocation were always accompanied by some rigorous thought about what could be done to improve the quality of life of dementia patients.

Perhaps the AAN will address these issues in a subsequent statement. And I hope that my professional society, the AGS, will take a leading role as an advocate for dementia patients who can no longer drive.

Comments

Marian Grant said…
We just had to take the keys away from a relative who lives alone in another state. Using the table in the article he's close to a 1. We have set up county housekeeping, shopping and transportation services, but he's having trouble remembering that. Now that he's been pushed out of his normal routine, we see how easily disoriented he is. Friends are scrambling to help but it's obvious we'll have to move him closer to us, likely into an ALF sooner rather than later. However, the 2 traffic citations/fender-benders in the last 6 weeks were enough to persuade everyone but him that the time had come. Very sad.
Chrissy Kistler said…
I couldn't agree with you more, Ken. Thank you for this terrific post. I absolutely understand the need to keep unsafe drivers off the road, but I don't think many younger people fully recognize how ego-destroying taking the keys away really is. We live in a culture with a profound admiration for automobiles. Many of our patients consider the keys to the family car a rite of passage. I vividly recall attending a group session for recovering alcoholics once where one of them was lamenting the loss of his keys and counting the days until he could get them back. It's a world-altering change.

On another note, I have been wondering if our signage systems and road laws don't make things difficult for older adults. There's a great (though old) article in the Atlantic monthly about the differences in the US versus European models. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/distracting-miss-daisy/6873/
I've been wondering about how it applies to older drivers as well. (And I love the fact that it's entitled: Distracting Miss Daisy).
Dan Matlock said…
Ken, a recurring theme of many of your posts (Nelson Mandela - Nov. 11th, Overlooking the Frail years - Jan. 2nd, Meaningful activities for persons with dementia - April 7) is to view elders with decreased function with respect. This is an extremely valuable contribution to the web and directly combats our ageist society. Please keep these up.

I had a medical student simplify the difference between SNFs and LTC by saying that LTCs were for "storage" ...at least he knew the difference.

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  


You can also find us on Youtube!


Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes…

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…