Skip to main content

Advance Care Planning: A Paradigm Shift


What is the purpose of Advance Care Planning?

I have been taught to view the goal as helping patients define what they would want done if they became seriously ill. But there is an important article by Rebecca Sudore and Terri Fried that convinces me I should think about this very differently. Sudore and Fried propose a paradigm shift: Advance care planning is not aimed at prespecifying decisions. Rather it is aimed at helping patients and their families make the best possible in-the-moment decisions.

Sudore and Fried note several serious problems with the traditional goals of advance planning. Most importantly, patients goals and preferences change as their health and circumstances change. One reason is that patients have a remarkable ability to adapt to their circumstances. For example, many well elders would say living with disability is unacceptable to them. However, once elders become disabled they find they can adapt, view their quality of life as good, and change their treatment preferences to reflect this. In this context, while advance directives can still be useful, they should be viewed as one of several sources of information that might be useful for in-the-moment decision making.

What makes this article particularly useful are specific suggestions for what clinicians can do to help their patients prepare to make the best possible in-the-moment decisions. The two tables in the article are full of useful suggestions of what a clinician might consider saying to a patient. A few selected examples:

  • To help motivate patients to prepare: "When patients talk with me and their loved ones about what would be important to them if they got sick, it helps them to keep a sense of control about their medical care and have piece of mind."
  • To help clarify values: "Some patients say if they become so sick that they could not recognize or talk to their loved ones, they would want all possible treatments to prolong their life. Other patients say they would rather have care focused on comfort. What kind of person are you?"
  • To clarify whether values have changed: "Your health has changed over time. Sometimes patients can get used to these changes and sometimes they can not. In the past you told me that ......"
  • To establish whether the patient wants to give the surrogate leeway in decision making: "Having told me what is important to you, what if your surrogate finds it difficult to provide this for you?" or "What if, based on changes in your health, the doctors recommend something different from what you have told your loved one?"
This is definitely a must read article.

by: Ken Covinsky

Comments

Anonymous said…
I enjoyed reading this article. It provides a thoughtful way to approach communication around goals of care with examples of phrases and questions to try. A great teaching tool for geriatric palliative medicine!
Amy Corcoran, MD
NYLegalNurse said…
I work one on one with family clients to discuss this while they are healthy so that they may direct family and loved ones on their choices.
Fern Wasserman RN MSN ANP BC APRN CLNC
Thanks for sharing the ideas in this Annals article, which I had not yet read. I agree that preparing patients and their surrogates for in-the-moment decision-making seems far more useful than the typical paradigm for advanced care planning.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…