![]() |
But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.
Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.
When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. On average, they had 1.5 new functional limitations, compared to their pre-sepsis baseline. These were major limitations that would have a profound effect on the ability to live independently. Examples of problems included requiring the help of a caregiver to manage finances, take medicine, bathe, or get dressed. In addition, there was a spike in cognitive impairment among survivors with a tripling of the risk for moderate or severe cogntive impairment.
Infection and sepsis are usually viewed as acute problems, with the assumption that the patient returns to normal if you "fix" the infection. But this study shows that among older persons, all is hardly normal once the infection is better. Many elders will go home to a different life. They will be less able to take care of themselves, and will be more reliant on family members and caregivers.
It would be interesting to note how often these new needs of sepsis survivors were recognized and anticipated by their hospital providers. But clinical experience suggests that most hospitals are structured in a way that made post-discharge care plans woefully inadequate. It is likely that infectious disease care was outstanding, but care directed at helping patients and their families manage new functional and cognitive impairment was poor.
These findings accentuate the need for better models of hospital and post-discharge care for elders admitted with serious illness. This care model needs to recognize that most of these elders will have a marked and often permament increase in disability. Our models of care need to help these elders live well with this disability and provide assistance to family members and other caregivers that help the elder stay at home.
by: Ken Covinsky
Comments
It was also really impressive to see two Beeson scholars collaborating.
It was an important demonstration of the need for outcomes research - particularly long-term outcomes in older adults.
The commentator really seemed to take the findings seriously. Now that we know about this effect, I hope people can begin to explore preventative or rehabilitative strategies. I know that Wes Ely is working on an ICU rehab - I don't know if it applies beyond delirium.
I am out of the hospital I week from urosepsis. I know my longterm outlook is not good. I never want to get this sick again. I want palliative care (not an electrical implant for pain like my Chronic Pain MD wants to give me). I want no more invasive tests with propofal - I know it causes cognitive decline in me. I know I have a pedigree with strong predisposition to Alzheimers. I do Not want that.
I do want a Case Manager to coordinate all the little murders that come with my various diagnoses. I want someone who my immediate family trusts to talk to my family. I just want to be heard!