Skip to main content

Outcomes of Surgery in Older Persons: How Could We Know So Little?

About half of all operations performed in the United States are performed on persons over the age of 65. So you would think that there would be tons of research to help us guide patients as they ask us questions about how their health will be impacted by an operation. But we know very little. As far as evidence-based medicine is concerned, surgery in the elderly is an evidence-based wasteland.

How will an 85 year old with severe knee arthritis do after a joint replacement? One reason that this question is so hard to answer is that 85 year olds are so different. This question can not be answered generically. Some are highly active, while others (even if they had good knees) are disabled physically and/or cognitively. We suspect functional factors like these are likely to have huge impacts on surgical outcomes, but there is almost no data to guide us.

And we even lack the most basic evidence to address the older patient's "How will I do after surgery" question. Most of the information we have is on rates of death and surgical complications such as post-operative pneumonia. Of course these are important, but when the older patient asks, "how will I do" often what they are really asking is "How long will it be before I get back to normal?" "How long will I have trouble taking care of myself and be dependent on family caregivers?" "How long will my thinking be abnormal after surgery?" "How long before I can climb up the flight of stairs to my home?" "I know death is a rare complication, but how often will I suffer a permament loss in my ability to function independently?"

The honest answer to these questions: "WE DON'T KNOW."

In the New Old Age blog, Paula Span reports on an important study that breaks useful ground in starting to address these important questions. Led by Dr. Martin Makary, a surgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital, the study proves that easy to measure markers of the patient's functional status strongly predict outcomes after surgery in older patients.

Markary used a 5 item frailty score (Weight loss, poor grip strength, exhaustion, low physical activity, decreased walking speed). The number of these measures on which a patient was frail strongly predicted outcomes after surgery. In fact, the frailty score seemed to be a better measure of surgical risk than the age of the patient or standard measures of surgical risk. The frailty score strongly predicted the risk of post-operative complications, or the need for nursing home care after surgery.

This study is a very useful advance in our understanding of surgical outcomes in older persons, but there is a need for much more research. Further studies need to better refine which measures of patient functioning best predict surgical outcomes. For example, this study did not measure cognitive functioning, which is undoubtedly a very important determinant of outcomes.

More importantly, while this study showed that it is important to assess functional ability before surgery, we need to know more about what happens to functional ability after surgery. This study advanced our understanding of commonly used surgical outcomes, but did not look at functional status outcomes. (ie, how long will my caregiver need to help with basic activities of daily living? How long before my walking is back to normal?)

We need studies in older persons that really provide an answer when the patient asks, "How will I do after surgery?"

Hopefully this study is the first of many from this team that begin to address these vital questions.

by: [Ken Covinsky]

Comments

Tim Cousounis said…
It's been my experience (professionally and personally) that much more is known than communicated (to patients and/or families).
It's been the slow rate of adoption of evidence-based practices, coupled with poor clinician-patient communications, which need to be improved.

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Advance Care Planning before Major Surgery: A Podcast with Vicky Tang

This week's podcast is all about the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, advanced care planning and surgery with our guest Dr. Vicky Tang.  Vicky is an assistant professor and researcher here at UCSF.  We talk about her local and national efforts focused on this intersection, including:
Her JAMA Surgery article that showed 3 out of 4 older adults undergoing high risk surgery had no advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Prehab clinics and how ACP fits into these clinicsThe Geriatric Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program whose goal is to set the standards for geriatric surgical care including ACP discussions prior to surgeryHow frailty fits in and how to assess it (including this paper from JAGS on the value of the chair raise test) So take a listen and check out some of those links.  For those who want to take a deeper dive into how GeriPal and surgery fit together, check out these other podcasts: Zara Cooper on Trauma Surgery, Geriatrics, and Palliative Car…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …