Skip to main content

American Geriatrics Society’s Palliative Care SIG


We need you input. The American Geriatrics Society's (AGS) Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, is only about a month away. Importantly for our GeriPal community, the palliative care special interest group (SIG) at AGS is scheduled for Wednesday May 11 from 5:45 to 7pm in the Maryland 1 room. We have a couple topics that we are planning to cover, but we wanted to see whether you want anything else.

Here are three items that we are planning for this years agenda:
  • We have asked Christine Ritchie to discuss her work in creating collaborations between AAHPM/AGS. Many of us may have heard some portions of this collaboration but may be unsure what it is doing and where is it going. This is an opportunity to find out more about this fascinating collaboration and what it means for us.
  • We have asked Paul Tatum to discuss where we are with the creation of the Geriatrics SIG at AAHPM.  For those of you who don't know, there isn't yet a geriatrics SIG yet at AAHPM.  Paul though is spearheading the movement to start one.  This would be another great way for both communities to work closer together.
  • We are planning to have a brainstorm exercise and breakout groups to work on SIG submissions. Our goal is to leave the SIG with at least two products that can be submitted as symposia for the following years annual meeting.

So, let us hear from you. What would draw you to a Wednesday night 5:45pm Palliative Care SIG? What would you want to get out of it? How can the SIG help you?

by: Rachelle Bernacki and Eric Widera

Comments

Ella Bowman said…
Hi, Rachelle and Eric. I really like the agenda you both have proposed. I will certainly plan to be at this SIG no matter what the agenda :), but will very much like to hear more about Dr. Ritchie's work as well as open up further discussion about the AAHPM geriatrics SIG of which we were in attendance in Vancouver. Take care and let me know if you need any organizational help from your colleagues at IUSM!

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…