Skip to main content

Poll: Will You Take a Pill That Adds 500 Years to Your Life?

 

Will you take a pill that adds 500 years to your life?


I have a pill that will add 500 years to your life (OK, I don't really, please don't email me asking for one).  But let's say I did.  Would you take it?  Yes or no?  You have 1 minute to decide, then answer the poll above.  If you have any conditions to your vote, post them in the comments. 

Why ask this question?  The question is - to what extent should we be focusing our research dollars on therapies that extend life.  Of course, the question is not this simple - 500 years at what quality, at what cost, where will the centenarians live?  But the basics of the question rest on this primary question, not the details.  Or maybe you want to disagree. 

It's up to you.

You still have 30 seconds.

by: Alex Smith

Comments

Lindsey Yourman said…
Among other things, it would depend on whether I had seen the natural history of anyone else who had taken the pill . . . What was their quality of life like living 500 years? Were they functionally able to contribute in meaningful ways? Was it isolating to live so much longer than other people? How many other people are likely to have access to and take this pill? Also, I'd want to be able to reverse my decision (e.g. euthanasia) if living so long turned out to be too physically or emotionally painful.
Anonymous said…
Not enough info in question. Would entirely depend on whether I have lifelong subscription to GeriPal.org
Hmmm... can I get a pill for my loved ones as well? would hate to do it alone and watch them all die when I got to live "forever". I would also want the "opt out" pill for the emotional distress I anticipate would happen after about 200 years...
Dan Matlock said…
Only on a dare... I've taken a lot of pills on a dare.
Helen Chen said…
Depends: would our 500 year trajectory be like MacLeod's (the Immortal in Highlander--swashbuckling for centuries) or more like Daruma (didn't live to be 500, but was very wise and functionally disabled at the end of life)? Would 500 be the new 30? or would 500 simply be the 500?
Sara Perry said…
No thank you. That would be way too long for me. My soul will be ready for its next exciting adventure long before then. I'm a strong proponent of quality of life over quantity. I even wrote a 5 page Addendum to my Five Wishes Advance Directive to further clarify my wishes. Its title? "Morphine, Ice Cream, and Chocolate: My End Of Life Wishes."
Eric Widera said…
Depends on what happens to the other 6 billion people on earth. Do we have the resources for all of them or will my taking this pill even further separate the haves from the have nots. I think I'm already selfish enough - can't thinkright now about even taking more especially after watching CNN tonight.
Anonymous said…
I suspect that I would give it a try only after moving to Washington, Oregon, or Montana.
Niamh said…
I'd rather take a pill to stay young.
guym said…
Sure, all the usual caveats - e.g., like Helen suggested, the years after 100 wouldn't be misery; this pill would slow down 'aging.' And, of course, I'd want others to get to take it, not just me... though, if it were offered to just me, I might well respond like my doctor did when I asked him if he'd take such a pill. His (instant) reply: "in a heartbeat!" If life is 'good' (in my view) today and the prospect is good for tomorrow, why would I not want to live another day, and yet another?
Anonymous said…
I'd say no, because I have no idea what a 500-year life cycle would be like. 80 years makes sense to me: you're born, learn basic senses, go to school, try to figure out who you are, get married, have kids, maybe become more comfortable in who you are, work on your career, enjoy yourself, travel, retire, reflect on your life.

What would the life cycle be if we lived for 500 years? Would we reflect for 400+ more years? I don't know how the natural evolution of a life would occur if it stretched out that long. I think I'd be confused.. or bored.
Joanne Seifert said…
If my husband could take the pill, too, and I could have 500 more years with him you bet I would.

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  


You can also find us on Youtube!


Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes…

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…