Skip to main content

Poll: Will You Take a Pill That Adds 500 Years to Your Life?

 

Will you take a pill that adds 500 years to your life?


I have a pill that will add 500 years to your life (OK, I don't really, please don't email me asking for one).  But let's say I did.  Would you take it?  Yes or no?  You have 1 minute to decide, then answer the poll above.  If you have any conditions to your vote, post them in the comments. 

Why ask this question?  The question is - to what extent should we be focusing our research dollars on therapies that extend life.  Of course, the question is not this simple - 500 years at what quality, at what cost, where will the centenarians live?  But the basics of the question rest on this primary question, not the details.  Or maybe you want to disagree. 

It's up to you.

You still have 30 seconds.

by: Alex Smith

Comments

Lindsey Yourman said…
Among other things, it would depend on whether I had seen the natural history of anyone else who had taken the pill . . . What was their quality of life like living 500 years? Were they functionally able to contribute in meaningful ways? Was it isolating to live so much longer than other people? How many other people are likely to have access to and take this pill? Also, I'd want to be able to reverse my decision (e.g. euthanasia) if living so long turned out to be too physically or emotionally painful.
Anonymous said…
Not enough info in question. Would entirely depend on whether I have lifelong subscription to GeriPal.org
Hmmm... can I get a pill for my loved ones as well? would hate to do it alone and watch them all die when I got to live "forever". I would also want the "opt out" pill for the emotional distress I anticipate would happen after about 200 years...
Dan Matlock said…
Only on a dare... I've taken a lot of pills on a dare.
Helen Chen said…
Depends: would our 500 year trajectory be like MacLeod's (the Immortal in Highlander--swashbuckling for centuries) or more like Daruma (didn't live to be 500, but was very wise and functionally disabled at the end of life)? Would 500 be the new 30? or would 500 simply be the 500?
Sara Perry said…
No thank you. That would be way too long for me. My soul will be ready for its next exciting adventure long before then. I'm a strong proponent of quality of life over quantity. I even wrote a 5 page Addendum to my Five Wishes Advance Directive to further clarify my wishes. Its title? "Morphine, Ice Cream, and Chocolate: My End Of Life Wishes."
Eric Widera said…
Depends on what happens to the other 6 billion people on earth. Do we have the resources for all of them or will my taking this pill even further separate the haves from the have nots. I think I'm already selfish enough - can't thinkright now about even taking more especially after watching CNN tonight.
Anonymous said…
I suspect that I would give it a try only after moving to Washington, Oregon, or Montana.
Niamh said…
I'd rather take a pill to stay young.
guym said…
Sure, all the usual caveats - e.g., like Helen suggested, the years after 100 wouldn't be misery; this pill would slow down 'aging.' And, of course, I'd want others to get to take it, not just me... though, if it were offered to just me, I might well respond like my doctor did when I asked him if he'd take such a pill. His (instant) reply: "in a heartbeat!" If life is 'good' (in my view) today and the prospect is good for tomorrow, why would I not want to live another day, and yet another?
Anonymous said…
I'd say no, because I have no idea what a 500-year life cycle would be like. 80 years makes sense to me: you're born, learn basic senses, go to school, try to figure out who you are, get married, have kids, maybe become more comfortable in who you are, work on your career, enjoy yourself, travel, retire, reflect on your life.

What would the life cycle be if we lived for 500 years? Would we reflect for 400+ more years? I don't know how the natural evolution of a life would occur if it stretched out that long. I think I'd be confused.. or bored.
Joanne Seifert said…
If my husband could take the pill, too, and I could have 500 more years with him you bet I would.

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…