Skip to main content

Poll: What Does Personalized Medicine Mean to You?



Much has been made of the potential of the genome, perhaps none of it more tantalizing than the concept of "tailoring" therapies to individual patients' genes.  But to date, examples of successful use of this technology are scarce, and completely absent from the daily practice of most clinicians I know.

There has been a big push from some scientists to define this technology as "personalized medicine" - a term that has been around for a long time (longer than the genome has been sequenced).  Is this what personalized medicine means to you?

On the one hand, I believe these efforts are important (I voted to take the pill that would extend my life 500 years in the last poll).  On the other hand, I worry that the focus and expense of this effort may detract from other areas of research.  Like researching how to teach clinicians to really get to know the patient in front of them (not just their genes).

Maybe we should take back this term.

by: Alex Smith

Comments

Agustin Garrigos said…
I believe there is a role for "personalizing" medical care. In this month's issue of the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine-Volume 78, Number 4- there is an article on Pharmacogenomics. The premise is that "Testing for polymorphism before prescribing certain drugs could help avoid adverse drug effects and improve efficacy." While the greater availablity of testing is often a surrogate for doctor patient interactions, the greater accuracy afforded by these technological advances will, in a not too distant future, change the way primary care medicine is practiced. Primary care physicians will become a thing of the past, I believe.
Getting to know our patients remains important as long as medicine remains a science of probabilities. Once we can personalize care, we won't be needed. I am not sure hat is a bad thing.
herbal remedies said…
Primary care physicians can benefit from this study. It helps them attend to the different needs of their patients.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …