Skip to main content

The Third Annual Hastings Center Cunniff-Dixon Physician Awards


The Cunniff-Dixon Foundation in collaboration with the Hastings Center and the Duke Institute on Care at the End of Life just announced it will now be accepting nominations for the third Annual Hastings Center Cunniff-Dixon Physician Awards.

The goal of this one of a kind award is to encourage excellent end-of-life care by giving physicians national recognition for their clinical contributions and commitment to the cause of end-of-life medical care.

The 2012 award prizes tops off at $95,000. There will be two unrestricted $25,000 prizes for senior and mid-career physician who demonstrate, through leadership and practice, a serious commitment to end-of-life care. Another three unrestricted awards of $15,000 each will go to physicians early in their careers (less than 7 years in practice) who have made a valuable contribution, through practical research or clinical work, in the field of end-of-life medicine.

As a 2011 award winner, I cannot understate the importance of the award from a professional development standpoint, as well as its importance in highlighting the efforts of the entire palliative care team to both institutional and community stakeholders. It was also inspiring to meet the Cunniff-Dixon foundation’s founder, Andrew Baxter, as well as Dr. Robert Martensen (who among his other accomplishments is also the director of the National Institutes of Health Office of History). To see some of the award ceremonies from last year, click on the following video.



Nominations will be accepted through September 30, 2011, and all nominees must be licensed physicians practicing in the United States. Any individual or group, including professional associates, patients, and families, can submit nominations (the nomination that led to my 2011 award was submitted by the brother of a deceased veteran that was cared for in our hospice unit).

To either download a nomination form or a brochure, please go to the Hastings Center Website or the Cunniff-Dixon website.


by: Eric Widera

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …