Skip to main content

Inappropriate prescribing



It's been a while since I posted but I had to share frustration! This week I saw a new patient who has been receiving prescriptions for Librium and Serax (benzodiazepine) from her dentist/oral doctor. That was only one of a long list of issues this woman had which were concerning to me. But when there's a trickle, there's a flood. I also just received notice of a new referral for a woman needing geriatrics care whose ophthalmologist has been filling her ativan.

These specialists may very well be well-meaning, trying to help these women's anxiety in the face of either poor or lack of primary care. But the unintended consequences of such prescribing is frightful to think of.

It raises for me the profile of:

  1. The lack of knowledge most practicing providers have on inappropriate medications for older adults
  2. The likelihood that there are probably countless more patients who are receiving prescriptions for medications which not only should not be prescribed to them but should be given and monitored by a primary care physician or psychiatrist and not by a specialist
  3. How many providers who, even if they know such prescriptions are beyond their scope of practice, may prescribe such drugs because: it's easier, it quiets their patient, or it's harder to say no or to tell the patient to get it from their PCP/psychiatrist or to find a PCP/psychiatrist

by: Helen Kao

Comments

Thanks for sharing. I'm also very concerned about how many older adults get prescribed the wrong medications/doses. Seems like most physicians and other prescribers aren't aware of the serious side effects that can result from what they thought was a trivial refill. Yet these scripts can literally mean the difference between life and death for some patients.

There is an article called "Promoting More Conservative Prescribing" http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/301/8/865.full that I like to use when teaching med students and physician colleagues. It is easy to read, full of common sense clinical pearls, and applies to prescribing for patients of all ages.

Wen Dombrowski, MD
Fredrick said…
Hey Implante, why you are silent here?? I found this informative just.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…