Skip to main content

Who Wants to Talk about Sex?

Early in my career, I cared for a gentleman with advanced pancreatic cancer. The recurrence of his cancer was devastating, and I knew his decline would be rapid. Each week he came to my office to review his symptoms, and each week was the same- a little nausea, some increased pain and no appetite whatsoever. A few weeks before his death, he came to the clinic with his wife and asked for a prescription of Viagra. With all of his symptoms, I assumed sex would be the last thing on his mind. What he said next has never left me:

“There are few things in life I still enjoy. Making love to my wife is one of them, and I want to keep doing this as long as I possibly can.”

After this soul etching quote, one might think I would ask each dying patient about their sexual concerns- but I have not. Year after year I struggle with asking dying patients, “Are you sexually active?” Furthermore, if I ever get the courage to ask the darn question, what on earth am I to do with the answer?

As it turns out, reluctance in assessing dying patients' sexual concerns is common amongst health care providers. Horden and Street published an article describing the disconnect between the patient and/or spouse’s desire to be asked about sexual concerns and the health care provider’s reticence to bring up the topic.

Here are some themes identified during the study from providers who were interviewed:

  • It’s not life or death

  • I manage to avoid the topic

  • I can’t expose my vulnerability

  • It’s too risky

The bottom line is that most providers don’t think that the topic is very important at the end of life. If it was important, wouldn't the patient and/or spouse bring it up? Guess what- most are waiting for the provider to bring it up! Lemieux et al reported that one out of ten patients interviewed by their health professional in a palliative care hospital or home care setting had been asked about their sexuality, but ten out of ten felt a nurse or doctor should have brought it up.

The mismatch in patient desire to discuss sexuality versus clinician lack of appreciation of the importance needs to be addressed. It may be beneficial for clinicians to re-define what it means to be “sexually active.” As a dying patient's hopes and goals morph over time, so might the definition of sexuality. Is there a coital imperative that must be met to be sexually active? Or might sexuality have broader meaning?

Starting with a question like, “What does sexuality or intimacy mean to you?” may be an easier way to begin the conversation.

For more on this topic, click on the following links: sex and aging and sex and drugs (with or without rock and roll)

by: Tanya Stewart MD FAAHPM


Sara said…
How can a health care provider decide a patient's "quality of life" is not good enough to continue medical treatments if the provider doesn't know what the patient thinks is important? It seems there are many topics patients think doctors and nurses should bring up, not knowing that they have to ask the questions to get the conversations going.

Thank you so much for a great post with relevant literature review!

I definitely think this area of life, study and patient care holds many opportunities for growth and improvement for us.

At the upcoming AAHPM in Denver next week, I note that there will be exactly one break-out session that touches on sexuality along with some other complicated topics. It is listed under "humanities." Hopefully, in following years more than one session will be offered, and that these sessions will move out of the "humanities" curiosity shop and into clinical-care categories.

I have often wondered if, considering the demands of medical training, that perhaps there might be selection biases, which operate from the pre-med years, forward, and that perhaps lend preference to those who harbor reticences about any number of social processes. So that these peculiar reticences are carried forward into training and on into practice, where they become normative. One set of null hypotheses being, pre-med students, medical students, residents, fellows and attending physicians are as open to, interested in, and experienced about matters of sexuality and intimacy as their non-medical peers. If the alternative hypotheses are true, then we might have to engage in some personally challenging work to catch up with our patients.

Even if there is no difference between physicians and the rest of society on these matters, we still need to step up to the plate in order to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes that enable us to competently and confidently provide the kind of care that is needed and wanted by our patients and their families.
I just saw that the single concurrent session at the AAHPM/HPNA, which touches on sexuality along with some other complicated topics, "Sex, Drugs, and Rockin’ Chairs: Palliative Care Assessment of the Taboo. Are We Doing Enough?," which is scheduled for Saturday morning is actually yours, Tanya!

Thank you!
Tom Perls MD said…
Along these lines, Ernest Borgnine apparently has the secret to living so well into his 90s:
Sara: Thank you for your comments. Ideally doctors or nurses are guides to their patients. I find working as partners with the patient/spouse/family is key- and making the environment safe is imperative.

Brian: The dearth of literature on this topic is somewhat alarming and very little has been done in the US. So, for researchers out there- this is fertile ground. You are very wise to suggest we have a lot of catching up to do. The same was true 1-2 decades ago about discussing death as "normal" part of life.

I do not recall sexuality as a topic at past AAHPM meetings so simply including the topic under any category is a major step forward.

Tom: I laughed so hard I shook the house. Thank you!!
BenAzevedo said…
Hi Tanya,

Thanks for the encouragement to keep asking about this topic, and not only in palliative care. As a med student I am still uncomfortable when I get near the end of the "social history," but I have to remind myself that patients want me to ask it and that with practice, it will become easier. Thanks for the story, and great to meet you today.
HospiceNP said…
My 81 year old mother who has advanced dementia and has been a widow for 20+ years often says she is looking for a boyfriend "but all his parts have to work!"
Steffi said…
just linked this article on my facebook account. it’s a very interesting article for all.

Health Care
Anonymous said…
Haha ' love it!

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Advance Care Planning before Major Surgery: A Podcast with Vicky Tang

This week's podcast is all about the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, advanced care planning and surgery with our guest Dr. Vicky Tang.  Vicky is an assistant professor and researcher here at UCSF.  We talk about her local and national efforts focused on this intersection, including:
Her JAMA Surgery article that showed 3 out of 4 older adults undergoing high risk surgery had no advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Prehab clinics and how ACP fits into these clinicsThe Geriatric Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program whose goal is to set the standards for geriatric surgical care including ACP discussions prior to surgeryHow frailty fits in and how to assess it (including this paper from JAGS on the value of the chair raise test) So take a listen and check out some of those links.  For those who want to take a deeper dive into how GeriPal and surgery fit together, check out these other podcasts: Zara Cooper on Trauma Surgery, Geriatrics, and Palliative Car…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.


You can also find us on Youtube!

Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …