Skip to main content

Many Disabled Seniors Have a Good Quality of LIfe



A dominant focus of research in Geriatric Medicine has been on the prevention of the types of disability that are common in older persons. This research is important, because if it is successful it will lead to more years of independent living in which seniors do not need the help of caregivers or care in nursing homes.

But in our zeal to prevent disability in older persons, we sometimes paint an overly bleak picture of disability. Preventing and delaying disability is a very good thing. But there are no interventions or lifestyle changes that fully prevent late life disability. Rather, effective interventions slow down the process. The vast majority of persons who live to old age will experience a period of disability, and this period will often be prolonged. Our research on prevention of disability needs to complemented by studies that teach us how to help frail and disabled elders have an excellent quality of life.

Is it really possible for a senior to be significantly disabled, dependent on others for help with basic activities of daily living, yet consider their quality of life good? A recent study in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society suggests that the answer is an emphatic YES.

This fascinating study interviewed 62 elderly persons who were cared for by On Lok, a San Francisco based program that cares for disabled older persons who are eligible for nursing home care, but wish to continue living in the community. In extended interviews, the seniors were asked about positive and negative aspects of their life.

The article title, "Quality of Life in Late-Life Disability: I don't feel bitter because I am in a wheelchair," nicely sums up the major themes. Despite severe disability (most needed help with multiple ADL), 78% of the seniors rated their quality of life as good or better.

The two central factors that were most important to maintaining quality of life were maintaining control over their daily lives and preservation of dignity. Maintaining a sense of control was often fostered by continuing activities that were important to each individual. Sometimes this meant being allowed to take risks. For example, some seniors felt providers and families too often tried to restrict their activities out of a fear they would fall.

Dignity meant being respected and valued as an individual. One participant noted how societal attitudes can be more harmful to seniors than activity limitations: "It is unfortunate that a lot of family or other people feel that once you're old, you don't know anything anymore, or you are just kind of in the way."

The article also provides a wealth of insights into other factors that impact quality of life in disabled elders. A few examples:

  • Adaptation: The ability to overcome physical limitations through assistive devices or behavioral modifications
  • Social well being: Positive relationships with family and friends, not feeling like you are a burden, and avoiding interpersonal conflicts
  • Psychological well being: Maintaining a positive attitude and the absence of depression or anxiety
  • Spiritual and religious well being: Faith in God, a sense of inner peace, and finding meaning in your daily activities

The study, which nicely bridges the disciplines of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (GeriPal research) was led be Dr. Jennifer King, now a family medicine resident at the Santa Rosa Family Medicine Residency, who completed the study while a medical student at UCSF. The senior author was Alexander Smith of the UCSF Division of Geriatrics.

One important lesson for clinicians and researchers is that most of the factors identified as important to these seniors are not included in any of our measurement or assessment tools. It will be hard to learn how to improve care for disabled seniors if we don't bother to measure the outcomes that matter the most to them. If we want to learn how to care for seniors with disability, we need to start by talking to them and learning from them.

by: Ken Covinsky (@geri_doc)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…