Skip to main content

Xanax Schmanax

As geriatricians and providers who work with older adults, many of whom are frail, we carry amongst our mantras the avoidance of benzodiazepines (xanax, halcion, ativan, valium to name a handful). Since the inception of the Beers Criteria on Potentially Inappropriate Medications for older adults, benzodiazepines have maintained their steady presence. (see post: http://www.geripal.org/2012/03/beers-criteria-contest-submit-craziest.html) Sadly, I see in my geriatrics practice that benzodiazepines also remain a common prescription for older adults in the community to treat everything from anxiety to insomnia, muscle aches and pain to fear of flying. The patient alluded to in the previous geripal post above who was on valium, halcion, ativan, and doxepin was only one of the MANY patients I encounter in my primary care and consult practice. While her combination of prescriptions was horrifying, I often feel equally depressed and frustrated when I see new patients who come to me with just one benzodiazepine. It is not uncommon that I have new patients who have been prescribed two: valium and restoril, ativan and clonazepam, ativan and restoril etc. Why does this upset me so? Just this week I met two new patients who were both on benzodiazepines. One was a 90 year old woman who was prescribed xanax a few years ago to help her with longstanding anxiety which has worsened as she has aged. She herself stated that her desire was to "not become addicted" to xanax (one of the RARE patients I meet on benzodiazepines who actually WANTS to come off). She has had a fall significant enough to cause a subdural hematoma. The second patient I saw was prescribed two benzodiazepines--because she moved here from Europe I had to look up the medication names she had been taking "for years" and, unfortunately, she has been on quite significant doses of both. She presented to me with what I see classically in long-standing benzodiazepine users--a tremendous relief when she takes the medication for her sleep but then a subsequent "wear off" effect where her anxiety rises through the day until she's in desperation by bedtime. Most of the new patients I see on benzodiazepines absolutely LOVE their benzos. The majority of them also complain to me of unsteadiness on their feet, history of falls, depression, trouble with memory. Benzos may not be directly correlated with all of these complaints, or even with my 90yo woman's prior fall above. But they sure raise my concern. While some of these patients have had a trial of SSRIs--and fewer a trial of therapy, sleep training, meditation or other treatment--many of these patients coming to me have not had a trial of ANY OTHER treatment for their anxiety, insomnia, etc. My concern about how widely benzodiazepines are doled out to patients in their 70s, 80s, 90s is that this may seem like a quick fix for a patient's anxiety, insomnia, or whatever is ailing them. (And I fully recognize that some patients may directly approach their primary care provider with a request for xanax, valium or ativan.) But the downstream sequelae is that these patients (almost always) become incredibly attached to their benzos and inevitably are at risk, as they age, of significant adverse effects. And almost all of them are reluctant to come off the medication--even if their anxiety or insomnia are not as well-managed as they themselves would like. Indeed, a number of patients on longstanding benzos develop WORSENING of anxiety, sleep and depression over time. I shudder when I see a new patient in my practice who is frail, wobbly, and cognitively impaired who complains to me not only of anxiety or insomnia but that their walking is unsteady, they keep falling, or they just can't think the way they used to. Most of the time, these patients also have the usual combination of chronic illness which need to be addressed--hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, COPD etc. The quick fix medication becomes the locus of what often ends up being a months-long (sometimes years-long) process of educating my patient (or their family/caregiver) about how we can better treat their anxiety and insomnia, and carefully taper them down. I am not always successful (yet) with some patients. But I (and many families and patients) do often find success at the end of a LONG road to taper benzodiazepines. What is unfortunate is that the time and effort to slowly, carefully and always reassuringly taper someone down off a medication they have long-perceived to be a lifeline to calm and peace, is arduous and often takes up significant time in clinic sessions such that addressing their chronic conditions, or even acute illnesses, have to constantly be re-triaged. I do not have a 100% avoidance policy against benzodiazedines. There are a small number of indications for which benzodiazepines can be very appropriate. And, certainly, within the more palliative-hospice goal-directed care I provide for patients approaching death, benzodiazepines can be incredibly helpful. But how do we educate our patients and colleagues in health care that benzodiazepines should NEVER be the firstline prescription handed to an older adult for anxiety or insomnia. by: Helen Kao

Comments

Helen Chen, MD said…
Helen, I've definitely seen this disturbing benzo phenomenon too. Unfortunately, there are many competing pressures/problems that may not be entirely soluble with just education. There are many people who believe in "better living through pharmaceuticals" prescribed or otherwise. I would also argue that many physicians want to say "yes" to patient requests--we are after all in a helping profession--and I wonder if the bonus-related effects of Press-Ganey, HCAHPS scores, and other patient satisfaction incentive programs also potentiate this problem.

That being said, it has always been my contention that 21st century medicine addresses the question "can we?" while 21st century geriatricians/geriatrics focused healthcare professionals attempt to reframe the question as "should we?" Saying no in a positive way takes courage, stamina, and in some cases, institutional support.

Helen C.
Amen and right on to both Helens. As a Geriatric Care Manager specializing in the Dementias, when I go into a home, far,far too often I see one or more bottles of benzos for the person with dementia. What's worse is it is seen as the answer by the family, rather than having to put more effort into caregiving that engages the person, not sedates them.
Anonymous said…
This is very interesting. I'm in a situation where an elderly in-law is having very serious anxiety as well as many other geriatric issues, including unsteadiness. We're a long ways away from her and there really are no more local family caregivers, so we're very dependent on the professional medical support she can receive through various assistance programs. She's on xanax at the moment. I'm reluctant therefore to question their judgment and yet I'm also wary personally of psychiatric medicines and the propensity to overmedicate. I just don't know how plausible the alternative you suggest here is in our situation or many others--e.g., if the alternative involves extensive clinic sessions, it's just not going to happen for all sorts of reasons. She was experiencing fragility and acute anxiety before being medicated as well, so it's terrible hard to even guess what part might involve pharmaceutical effects and what else is involved.
Anonymous said…
My dad was in the hospital for a spell and doing well. He was about to come home and evidently awoke early one morning and demanded to go home. The nurses called his doctor and he prescribed Xanax for him. When I arrived a few hours later, my dad was like a zombie.......could not talk correctly, or control his arms or legs. He went downhill from there....and never recovered. I think they sent him home with pills for "anxiety, so he was probably taking a bit each day......his body just shut down slowly. On his death certificate they wrote "congestive heart failure", yet his legs were not swollen at all and his heart and breathing seemed fine. My dad realized they had done something to him, because a day after the first time they gave him the Xanax he rallied enough to tell me to "Sue the #@$%** if I don't come out of this"......and he didn't. When you see an elderly patient tied to a hospital bed, moaning and trying to talk, but all they can do is sound like a wailing animal, you can be pretty sure they are not crazy, but have been given an overdoes of seditives to shut them up and render them powerless.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…