Skip to main content

A DNR Tattoo? Really? Great Teaching Image for Geriatrics or Palliative Care

(To see the JGIM image click this link )
Perhaps you have said, or heard someone declare, "I want DNR tattooed across my chest!"

Well, someone actually had it done.  See this image in JGIM of the tattoo and the unusual story behind it.  In this case, the DNR tattoo was the result of a lost bet in a drinking game - bad idea jeans - the patient actually wanted to be full code!   


In an accompanying editorial, Bernie Lo and I describe the problem with actually tattooing DNR across your chest.  As we say, the idea is intuitively appealing, but flawed as policy.


This could be used a teaching image about respecting individuals' rights to avoid resuscitation.  The idea is to provoke a thoughtful discussion.  Questions for trainees could include:

  • What is behind the idea of the DNR tattoo?  Why would someone say that, or do it?
  • Imagine you are seeing a new patient who arrests in front of you.  Preparing to do CPR you see a DNR tattoo on the chest.  How do you respond?  Why? Should DNR tattoos be respected?
  • What can we do to protect the interests of people who really do not want to be resuscitated?
  • Should we as a society put greater ironclad protections in place for people to irrevocably fix their code status at DNR?  What are the risks?  What if someone codes from anaphylaxis? Chokes on some food in front of you?
  • What do you think about allowing leeway or flexibility in decision making?  In all cases? Giving the surrogate leeway? The clinician?  Do the advance directive forms or POLSTs you use allow for leeway? Should they?
  • What do you think about Ulysses contracts? (Then Ulysses said, "Eurylochus, come quickly! Tie me to the mast, for I shall hear the Sirens song and live!").  Caringadvocates offers such documents (run by frequent GeriPal commenter Stan Turman). Example: do not give me food or water when I have advanced dementia, no matter what I say or do.

Feel free to share your teaching experiences in the comments.  I think the geriatrics and palliative care communities really appreciated the discussion about how to use this video from a previous post as a teaching tool. 

by: Alex Smith

Comments

Suzana Makowski said…
Alex,
Thanks for posting this.
I thought to share the article from BBC news about Joj Tomkins and her tatoo:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-14802369
Anonymous said…
This link, ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2819149.stm ), apparently from 2003, shows the same tattoo but with a different story.
Alex Smith said…
Please note that the image in the picture above is not the same as in the story described in JGIM. Click on the link in the caption or text to see that image (i didn't want to violate copyright).
Pashta MaryMoon said…
I have two DNR tattoos -- DNR on my right wrist, and 'No CPR' on my left chest -- to ensure that paramedics/etc. understood my intentions. The photos can seen at http://cindea.ca/advance-planning.html#AssuranceAD
Anonymous said…
I took care of a hospice patient once with a tattoo on his chest, "NO CPR, no resuscitation". He was a quadraplegic post MVA many years previously. It was not considered valid once he died. Due too, " NO WITNESSES signatures". So this mans extreme measures to have his wishes known, we're to no avail! I thought this was very sad!
Anonymous said…
I'm an EMT working in NYC, and I've been talking about getting a tattooed DNR for ages, though I plan to wait until it becomes legally valid. My idea is to pass a bill that would establish the legality of a tattooed DNR if it included a tattooed copy of my signature, my doctor's, and a witness. Part of obtaining the DNR would include the text of the tattoo on carbon paper complete with the original signatures, which a tattoo artist could then just use as his template.

All I know is that I want one. I've seen too many dying and dead people to ever want that kind of quality of life.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…