Skip to main content

SNF’s - the discharge pathway of choice for those at the end of life



Few details are actually known about the proposed settlement of a nationwide class-action lawsuit against Medicare that would do away with the requirement to show a likelihood of medical or functional improvement before Medicare would pay for skilled services such as physical therapy.    However, unless there is a monumental change in how we deliver skilled care to Medicare enrollees, there are two conclusions that I feel safe in making:
  1. More individuals will be using the Medicare Skilled Nursing (SNF) benefit at the end of life
  2. The ability to provide high quality palliative care to these individuals will be diminished

Why will more individuals use Medicare SNF Benefit at the end of life?

There will be little incentive to prevent more and more individuals with limited ability to improve with skilled care to move quickly from hospitals to SNFs. It is easier, quicker, and often feels "safer" to send someone to a SNF from a hospital than it is to spend hours on having difficult discussions about a patient's end of life preferences and goals.  And please make no mistake about it, this is a hospital to SNF problem, as SNF’s are the discharge pathway of choice for those at the end of life.

To highlight the magnitude of the problem, I’d like to share some of the findings of a recent study published by some of our GeriPal colleagues: Katherine Aragon, Ken Covinsky, MD, Yinghui Miao, John Boscardin, Lynn Flint, and Alex Smith.

The authors of the study used data from Medicare claims and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to look at the prevalence of use of the Medicare SNF benefit in the last 6 months of life. Data from the 5,163 HRS respondents who were 65 years or older and had died between 1994 and 2007 revealed that:
  • The vast majority (88%) of SNF stays originated from the hospital 
  • Nearly a third (31%) of decedents had used the SNF benefit in the last 6 months of life
  • One in every 11 (9%) decedents died while receiving the SNF benefit.

The 1990’s showed a dramatic increase in SNF benefit at the end of life among community dwellers, increasing from 20% to 31%. Since then, things have been somewhat stable in regards to SNF use in the last 6 months of life, hovering in the low 30%’s.

Why will the ability to provide high quality palliative care to these individuals be diminished?

This one is easy.  Most patients enrolled in the SNF benefit are not eligible to receive concurrent hospice care, and furthermore, they likely would not have access to any other form of palliative care.

Medicare regulations prohibit dual enrollment in both the SNF benefit and the hospice benefit for the same diagnosis. Occasionally individuals can receive both benefits if the SNF care is for a diagnosis unrelated to the hospice diagnosis, but this is a rarity. It also means that the hospice benefit will likely lose out if someone is considering which one to enroll in, as Medicare will pay for room and board with the SNF Benefit as well as reimburse the nursing home at a higher rate.  No such luck with hospice care.

Data from the above study confirm this as they found:
  • only 0.5% of all decedents were enrolled in hospice during their SNF stay, although 9% of decedents died while enrolled in the SNF benefit.

What about other forms of palliative care? This study does not address whether these patients were receiving other forms of palliative care, but it is unlikely considering the low penetrance of high quality palliative care into skilled nursing settings.

What Will Need to Be Done to Address this Problem?

Considering it is election season, I'm going to end this post with a simple two point plan.  Presidential candidates, feel free to steal these ideas:
  1. Increase palliative care expertise in SNF’s by first passing the Palliative Care and Hospice Education and Training Act (PCHETA) into law
  2. Rethink whether the hospice benefit and the SNF benefit should continue to be mutually exclusive.

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)

Comments

Pagan Chaplain said…
In addition to the points raised in the article, this also means that SNFs will need in-house certified professional chaplains to help people and their families sort out goals of care and end-of-life preferences, whether as part of palliative care teams or not.
Anonymous said…
Dear Eric,
I am an NP, certified as FNP, Geriatrics, and Palliative, now working as a hospitalist NP. It is clearly wrong to have folks die while under Medicare A.
Seems to me the question is how to manage those folks who really do not meet rehab criteria and do most likely meet hospice criteria but do not qualify for GIP and they need to leave hospital but their families can no longer care for them at home?
I think it would be wonderful to have this benefit for all of us, but it is a huge game changer for the entire system-where is the conversation about all the issues?
Unknown said…
Many SNF (SAR here in NYC) patients are Nursing Home patients in all but name only. The rest are usually getting a few days of PT. The hospice benefit does not include PT, although sometimes a generous hospice will hire a PT at the family's request--usually to demonstrate that the staff and the pt have tried, and the patient has plateaued. PT is a medical treatment like any other, with benefits and burdens, and sometimes patients don't benefit from the requirement to do therapy daily. If more hospices were able to offer PT (our of their per diem, alas), then patients would not need concomitant enrollment in hospice and SNF.
Michael said…
As a hospital based Palliative Care physician in rural California, in my small community alone we face the issue of NO CONCURRENT Hospice and SNF care at least four times a month at discharge. We also see at least two valueless readmissions to the hospital each month. Many people die predictably within the first few weeks at SNF without the expertise and support of hospice even when they have avoided a miserable readmission. Let's finally take this issue over the goal-line. Millions of people have been suffering and millions of dollars have been wasted for nothing.
Robert Fitton said…
I run a SNF based palliative care program, I am a big supporter of hospice but many of my patients (and families) appropriately decline hospice.
The larger problem is lack of outpatient palliative care to identify high risk patients earlier so to avoid unnecessary ADMISSIONs never mind the readmissions.

This saving would help offset the patients who are too sick for home and rehab and not sickest enough for GIP

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …