Skip to main content

Star Wars, Behavioral Economics, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care


Obi-Wan: "These are not the droids you're looking for."
Stormtrooper: "These are not the droids we're looking for."
Obi-Wan: "He can go about his business."
Stormtrooper: "You can go about your business."
Obi-Wan: "Move along."
Stormtrooper: "Move along....move along."

What if there was a tool, or set of tools that could influence our behavior in ways that we didn't recognize, or even denied?  Would you call it The Force?

Well it turns out there is such a force, and it's called behavioral economics.  I recently finished reading a  book by Daniel Kahneman called Thinking, Fast and Slow.  Kahneman won the Nobel Prize for his landmark research that led to the field of behavioral economics.  The idea is that you can alter the context in which decisions are made. You can take advantage of the irrational (fast) way in which humans are hardwired to make decisions.

My question is, how can we harness this force for the good of geriatrics and palliative care?

Here is a brief primer on the methods of behavioral economics, the mnemonic MINDSPACE courtesy of some folks from the UK:
  • Messenger: We are heavily influenced by who communicates information
  • Incentives: Our response to incentives is shaped by predictable mental shortcuts such as strongly avoiding losses
  • Norms: We are strongly influenced by what others do
  • Defaults: We "go with the flow" of pre-set options
  • Salience: Our attention is drawn to what is novel and seems relevant to us
  • Priming: Our acts are often influenced by subconscious cues
  • Affect: Our emotional associations can powerfully shape our actions
  • Commitments: We seek to be consistent with our public promises, and reciprocate acts
  • Ego: We act in ways that make us feel better about ourselves
This is not coercion.  There is a perfectly ethical way to use behavioral economics.  I'm returning from a Greenwall conference where some very prominent bioethicists are thinking about how to use these tools for the good.  The context is already there, we just need to do a better job of attending to the message and subconscious cues the context is sending.

Here are some examples to prime the pump of ideas:
  • Default of full code.  Consequently, most hospitalized patients and nursing home residents (I think) are full code
  • The Choosing Wisely Campaign: Re-setting medical norms around ordering tests and treatments.  It's just not OK to be slathering on that ABH gel!  Everyone else has stopped doing it! (or at least I hope AAHPM wisely chooses ABH gel as verboten)
  • Paying hospitals a bonus up front, then taking away money if patients develop urinary tract infections in the hospital.  Hospital administrators value losses (taking away money) more than gains (a bonus at the end). (In this example, the paper says no difference was found after the up-front incentive was started.  More likely hospitals started changing their behavior the moment they heard the payment incentives were going to start, before folks in this study started measuring outcomes).
I look forward to your thoughts on how we can use behavioral economics to improve the quality of geriatrics and palliative care for older adults.

And now I have to run, I feel a tremor in the force...I have not felt that since...

by: Alex Smith @alexsmithMD

Comments

Anonymous said…
Great area of study! Why we do what we do is probably more important that what we do! Two other books I highly recommend on this brain science decisioon making topic are Nudge by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein that review the scince of " decision architecture" and why it works.
Another book I'm currently plowing through is Incognito by David Eagleman that talks about how in the world and ourselves goes on at an unconsious level.

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …