Skip to main content

The Do No Harm Project




I would like to introduce the Geripal community to a wonderful new project that two of my friends and colleagues at the University of Colorado have pioneered. It is called The Do No Harm Project.

Their goal is to emphasize trainee scholarship that highlights the wisdom of Bernard Lown’s credo: ‘do as much as possible for the patient and as little as possible to the patient.’

On their site, they argue, “Harms from overtesting, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment are a serious threat to the health of our patients and the long-term solvency of our health care system. Harms of overuse have not traditionally been taught to medical trainees and there are few incentives to pay attention to overuse: performance measures and payment incentives reward doing more, the legal system punishes underdiagnosis, and there is a dominant cultural belief that more care is better.”

The project is simple - residents submit vignettes where they have witnessed unnecessary harms from overtesting, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, or preference misdiagnosis. Vignettes may also illustrate the benefits of shared decision making. Once per quarter the best vignette is selected by a panel from the Colorado chapter of the American College of Physicians and awarded $50. Annually, each quarterly winner will be considered for case of the year and a $250 prize. Housestaff are encouraged to submit their work to journals and conferences for publication and all participants receive a book illustrating examples of overdiagnosis and evidence demonstrating the importance of its avoidance (Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health, H. Gilbert Welch).The cases are wonderful to read ranging from overuse of ICU care, unnecessary treatment related to incidental findings, and avoiding unnecessary surgery after engaging in shared decision making.

Personally, I find communicating that more isn’t always better to be one of the hardest things to do. What I love about The Do No Harm Project is the use of narratives - changing the dominant cultural belief that more is better will take more than research and policy, it will take stories.

If you are interested in learning more about the project or if you would like to explore starting something similar at your institution, please don’t hesitate to contact Tanner (tanner.caverly@ucdenver.edu) or Brandon (Brandon.combs@ucdenver.edu).

by: Dan Matlock

Comments

Anonymous said…
There is no mention of malpractice threat in regard to ordering tests and treatments that could likely be avoided or deferred. Nor the demands and preferences of patients and families who agree to testing "just to know" with no regard that the information would likely not change treatment nor outcome.This is particularly true when the patient has medicaid and there is no financial burden to the patient in doing the test. Healthcare reform must address tort reform and some way of educating health consumers of cost/benefit principles regardless of who is paying for the care.
Anonymous said…
Are we then to presume that doing something unnecessary and harmful will reduce risk of litigation? More importantly, do we not have an ethical obligation to educate our patients and engage them in shared decisions? These are the tired arguments that persist in our imperfect system.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …