Skip to main content

What is your patient's PPD status?

From the California Advance Directive, does not ask about PPD
Bree Johnston, a true believer in geriatrics and palliative care, contributor to GeriPal, and erstwhile colleague at UCSF, recently returned to give grand rounds.  She said that while in Scotland, she had the opportunity to observe geriatrics and palliative care teams.  Bree previously posted many of her observations on the blog here and here.

One thing I want to highlight about her experience was the contrast in what clinicians considered vital information about patient's approaching the end of life in the UK.  Their PPD status.  What, you say, do they have severe outbreaks of tuberculosis among the dying?

No, PPD stands for Preferred Place of Death.  They actually ask patients about their preferred place of death as part of the advance care planning process, document it, and make a big deal about trying to get the patient to that setting as death approaches.

This is remarkable!  In the US the subject often comes up in the research literature, as in something like, "Most patients prefer to die at home but a majority die in institutions like hospitals and nursing homes."

But we do not routinely as a health care system include preferred place of death as a part of advance care planning, or as a goal for care as patient's health deteriorates.  Preferred place of death is not captured on most advance directive forms (see picture).  We sometimes ask in palliative care, but not routinely.  It's certainly a far cry from how code status is treated in the US: we've put it on a pedestal.  Code status is now routinely assessed during hospital admission, once by the night float admitting the patient, then again in the morning by the day intern, and confirmed again later by the attending. Much-to-do about a little chest thumping, and arguably no where near as important as getting dying patients who want to be home, home.

Note: I was also reminded of preferred place of death while browsing all-things-palliative, a terrific compendium and calendar of, well, all things palliative!  I immediately found a link to an interesting study finding that 70% of Albertans prefer to die at home.

Canadians - love 'em; married one.

by: Alex Smith

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …