Skip to main content

$10,000 Design Challenge to Improve the Communication of End-of-life Preferences



Do you have any good ideas on how to get more people to complete advance directives early, re-visit them periodically, and for people with serious illness document their end-of-life wishes via forms like POLST? Well, it’s time to turn those ideas into something more.

The California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) Design Challenge is now in full swing.  The goal of the challenge is to "raise awareness of end-of-life care issues and to generate a variety of ideas for compelling experiences that could lead to greater activation and conversation about end-of-life preferences".  Anyone in the US is welcome to enter this design challenge, which will award $10,000 in prizes for inspirational solutions.

You can submit pretty much anything you think will get people talking about end-of-life preferences. Your proposed solutions can be something on a website or mobile app, it can be some type of product or object, it can be a marketing campaign, or even an art installation.

It also won’t take a lot to enter. You just need to:
  1. Create a design brief of 500 words or less summarizing your proposed solution
  2. Create a PowerPoint or video (max. 15 min) that visually communicates the proposed solution

Just keep in mind these three main guidelines:
  1. Your submission should promote awareness and create a compelling experience that leads to greater activation and more people communicating their preferences by having a conversation, and completing an advance directive or POLST form. 
  2. Your submission should target non-activated people, and help take a person from pre-contemplation to contemplation, or contemplation to action.
  3. Your submissions should not create additional advance care planning documents; existing forms and documents can be used.

Other than that, the challenge is pretty open ended. So get your creative juices flowing and submit something!

For more details, see http://healthcareexperiencedesign.com/eolc/

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Does “compassionate deception” have a place in palliative care?

by: Olivia Gamboa (@Liv_g_g)

There is broad consensus in the medical community that lying to patients is unethical.  However, in the care of patients with dementia, the moral clarity of this approach blurs.  In her recent New Yorker article, “The Memory House,”  Larissa MacFarquhar provides an excellent portrait of the common devices of artifice, omission and outright deception that are frequently deployed in the care of patients with dementia.  She furthermore explores the historical and ethical underpinnings of the various approaches used in disclosing (or not) information to patients living with dementia.

Ms. MacFarquhar introduces the idea of “compassionate deception,” or the concept that withholding truths, or even promoting outright falsehoods, is a reasonable and even ethical choice for those caring for patients with dementia.  To the extent that it helps a person with dementia feel happier and calmer, allowing them to believe in a gentler reality (one in which, say, their spo…