Skip to main content

5 Misconceptions About Palliative Care

Richard Besdine, MD medical officer for the American Federation for Aging Research, has a terrific piece in the Huffington Post about palliative care and misconceptions about the field.  This is GeriPal to the core.  Please follow this link to read the full version.

As a tantalizing preview, here are the 5 misconceptions in brief:
  1. If you accept palliative care, you must stop treatment.
  2. Palliative care is the same as hospice.
  3. Electing palliative care means you are giving up.
  4. Palliative care shortens life expectancy.
  5. There isn't need for palliative care because my doctor will address pain anyway.
Sound familiar?

by: Alex Smith @alexsmithMD

Comments

gercare6@hotmail.com said…
Thank-you very much for Dr.Besdine's piece in the Huffington Post. Now, can we please inform the American public about Palliative Care in fewer years than the too many it took to inform them about Hospice Care. Steve G. Doncevic
Anonymous said…
If the federal and state governments would use the provisions of the 1991 Patient Self Determination Act (PSDA) to mandate informed consent for BOTH and/or EITHER Curative Care or Palliative Care/Hospice transition at EOL, the American public would be better served.

But the AMA didn't want to be put under the provisions of the PSDA in 1991 and have the legal obligation to SEEK informed consent for one of two legal standards of care approved for reimbursement by Medicare. Overtreatment for profit then became possible when physicians did not have the legal obligation to inform patients about the other legal standard of care reibursed by Medicare.

Obviously, palliative care and hospice is a cheaper standard of care to deliver but it provides less profit for the specialist physicians who often provide non-beneficial curative care that may or may not be reimbursed by Medicare under existing reimbursement protocols.

Such a mandate for informed consent would perhaps stop the epidemic of unilateral/defult DNRs that are a reaction to refusal to reimburse by CMS and the private insurers who deliver or supplement Medicare for profit.

Shouldn't geriatric physicians blow the whistle on behalf of geriatric patients?
James Sinclair said…
While the 5th reason makes sense we all know it is not going to happen. Disease modifying physicians have no time to palliate disease. I find reason 1-4 troublesome because they all center around fear and fear of death in particular. If palliative care is designed to allow or even promote that fear we are in big trouble!

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Advance Care Planning before Major Surgery: A Podcast with Vicky Tang

This week's podcast is all about the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, advanced care planning and surgery with our guest Dr. Vicky Tang.  Vicky is an assistant professor and researcher here at UCSF.  We talk about her local and national efforts focused on this intersection, including:
Her JAMA Surgery article that showed 3 out of 4 older adults undergoing high risk surgery had no advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Prehab clinics and how ACP fits into these clinicsThe Geriatric Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program whose goal is to set the standards for geriatric surgical care including ACP discussions prior to surgeryHow frailty fits in and how to assess it (including this paper from JAGS on the value of the chair raise test) So take a listen and check out some of those links.  For those who want to take a deeper dive into how GeriPal and surgery fit together, check out these other podcasts: Zara Cooper on Trauma Surgery, Geriatrics, and Palliative Car…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …