Skip to main content

5 Misconceptions About Palliative Care

Richard Besdine, MD medical officer for the American Federation for Aging Research, has a terrific piece in the Huffington Post about palliative care and misconceptions about the field.  This is GeriPal to the core.  Please follow this link to read the full version.

As a tantalizing preview, here are the 5 misconceptions in brief:
  1. If you accept palliative care, you must stop treatment.
  2. Palliative care is the same as hospice.
  3. Electing palliative care means you are giving up.
  4. Palliative care shortens life expectancy.
  5. There isn't need for palliative care because my doctor will address pain anyway.
Sound familiar?

by: Alex Smith @alexsmithMD

Comments

gercare6@hotmail.com said…
Thank-you very much for Dr.Besdine's piece in the Huffington Post. Now, can we please inform the American public about Palliative Care in fewer years than the too many it took to inform them about Hospice Care. Steve G. Doncevic
Anonymous said…
If the federal and state governments would use the provisions of the 1991 Patient Self Determination Act (PSDA) to mandate informed consent for BOTH and/or EITHER Curative Care or Palliative Care/Hospice transition at EOL, the American public would be better served.

But the AMA didn't want to be put under the provisions of the PSDA in 1991 and have the legal obligation to SEEK informed consent for one of two legal standards of care approved for reimbursement by Medicare. Overtreatment for profit then became possible when physicians did not have the legal obligation to inform patients about the other legal standard of care reibursed by Medicare.

Obviously, palliative care and hospice is a cheaper standard of care to deliver but it provides less profit for the specialist physicians who often provide non-beneficial curative care that may or may not be reimbursed by Medicare under existing reimbursement protocols.

Such a mandate for informed consent would perhaps stop the epidemic of unilateral/defult DNRs that are a reaction to refusal to reimburse by CMS and the private insurers who deliver or supplement Medicare for profit.

Shouldn't geriatric physicians blow the whistle on behalf of geriatric patients?
James Sinclair said…
While the 5th reason makes sense we all know it is not going to happen. Disease modifying physicians have no time to palliate disease. I find reason 1-4 troublesome because they all center around fear and fear of death in particular. If palliative care is designed to allow or even promote that fear we are in big trouble!

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  


You can also find us on Youtube!


Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes…

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…