Skip to main content

Adding Prognosis to Cancer Screening Decisions: The ePrognosis Cancer Screening App



The goal of cancer screening is to identify asymptomatic cancer well before it causes symptoms or death.  This means that there is a long “lag time" before a patient sees a benefit from these screening tests.  This is in direct contrast to harms, which often occur rather immediately with these screening tests.  It would make sense then for us as health care professionals to focus cancer screening on those most likely to benefit from these medical interventions, and conversely, avoid screening in those who are unlikely to live long enough to see a benefit but will be exposed to immediate harms.  The problem is that as health care professionals, we aren't very good at this.

Multiple GeriPal posts have documented the health care systems proclivity at performing cancer screening in indivudals with a poor prognosis.  For some egregious examples, just take a look at these posts about cancer screening in those with dementia (here and here) and those with unresectable cancer (here and here).  It got so bad that back in 2010 Alex Smith wrote the following challenge in a post about "Dumb Medicine":
We need to train providers to have these difficult conversations, create health systems that flag patients with limited life expectancy who are receiving potentially harmful tests and interventions of little benefit, and educate the public about the harms of overtesting and overtreatment.

Well, Alex and a bunch of us GeriPal’ers took this challenge to heart by creating a free ePrognosis: Cancer Screening decision support app to help guide conversations with elderly patients of whether to start, stop, or continue breast cancer and/or colorectal cancer screening.   You can download it here for iPhones and iPads to try it out, or continuing reading to get a brief overview of what it does.

Overview of the ePrognosis Cancer Screening App 


ePrognosis home screen

When you start the app you’ll see the start screen asking you whether you are interested in screening for colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or both. Once you make a selection the app runs you through 15 health related questions including age, gender, BMI, symptoms, and functional impairment to calculate a mortality risk to estimate life expectancy.


Based on the response to these questions, you will be shown a speedometer like image that can help inform whether cancer screening is more likely to help or harm a patient.  You can also click on the "harms" or "benefits" buttons to learn more about what these may include.



Lastly, you can also click the learn more button, which will run you through a series of pictographs (each pictograph is of 1,000 squares where each square represents one person).  These pictographs visually display information on harms and mortality benefits from cancer screening, as well overall mortality risk at 10 years.

Overall mortality pictograph

Feedback

So give the ePrognosis app a try and tell us what you think.  What works well?  What can we do better?  Comment below!

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)


Here is the full link to the app: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/eprognosis-cancer-screening/id714539993?mt=8 



Comments

sky list said…

Today I can finally tell you something about one of the big things
that we've been working on home care
.This is something I'm tremendously
excited about -- we're rethinking commenting on home care
to be about building communities among both viewers and creators. The blog
Joshua Uy said…
I don't have the app in front of me, but when I've been communicating information, I've been trying to be flexible. Some patients think quantitatively but many think in value oriented terms and it is not obvious to some patients how to take the numbers and translate them into values. Sometimes it helps just to say them out loud. So for example, a colonoscopy is preventative measure that gives you no benefit now, takes years to see any benefit and the benefit is small. Many other interventions I have discussed with you are more likely to make an impact on your life, comfort and function now. It is reasonable to want to decline a colonoscopy. If you want to pursue it, the risk of harm may be just as great as the chance of benefit but the most likely thing that will happen is just an annoying day of diarrhea. If you care enough about wanting to avoid cancer to the point you are willing to undergo a useless/harmful intervention then it is a good idea for you. If not, don't do it.

In other words, maybe some questions on values could help the app decide if it is a better fit.
Goals (longevity, comfort, function), treatment preferences (curative, therapeutic, palliative, preventative, resuscitative). And the conclusion could have some recommendation of fit. Not sure if you want to get into that legally though.
Akon said…
As we already now health Screening is the premise identification of unrecognized disease The main aim of screening, to be sure that as few as available with the disease get through undetected and as few as possible without the disease are subject to further diagnostic tests.
Specifically a THC-containing drug called Marinol is FDA approved though it does not come close to effectiveness of natural cannabinoids. treat cancer
Is an Android or PC-based calculator available?
Is there an Android or web-based calculator for cancer screening available?
Eric Widera said…
We are working on it. Turns out that it costs a whole lot of money to develop apps for each operating system. Planning to use more of a web based system to avoid this.

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …