Skip to main content

Do Not Hospitalize orders for nursing home residents with advanced dementia

by: Alex Smith @alexsmithMD



Advanced dementia is a terminal illness needing palliative care. Unfortunately, there is a great divide between this statement of the world as it should be, and the current reality of the world as it is.  Rates of pain and shortness of breath are high for patients with advance dementia.  Patients with advanced dementia often reside in nursing homes, and few nursing homes offer specialized palliative care services.  And, as we can see from an article in this months Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, communication about prognosis and goals of care is still lacking.

In this study, Elizabeth Mann and colleagues asked health care proxies (generally family caregivers) of nursing home residents with advanced dementia a series of open-ended questions about Do-Not-Hospitalize orders.  Hospitalizing patients with advanced dementia is often (though not always) more  harmful, leading to potentially burdensome and painful interventions (feeding tube insertion, needle sticks, restraints). All decisions to hospitalize must be made in the context of the patient's goals and the risks and benefits of hospitalization, and alternative, namely, ongoing treatment in the nursing home. 

A Do-Not-Hospitalize order is appropriate for a patient whose goals are focused on comfort and maximizing quality of life without returning to the hospital.  The health care proxy for every nursing home resident with advanced dementia should have a discussion about the goals of the patient, the patients prognosis, and treatment options.  (Side note: The Minimum Dataset, a mandatory assessment of nursing home quality, records the Do-Not-Hospitalize status for each patient.  I suspect we focus more on this order in nursing homes than in the home setting in part because it is routinely measured in nursing homes.)

Dr. Mann and colleagues interviewed 16 health care proxies.  They found:
  • 10 nursing home residents had a Do-Not-Hospitalize order.  None were on hospice.
  • Many did not understand what a Do-Not-Hospitalize order meant.  Three thought they had placed a Do-Not-Hospitalize order when they had not.
  • Many were not aware that their loved ones with advanced dementia would inexorably decline.
"Right now she's not on physical therapy, which they took her off....She's not walking...She used to walk.  So I would like to get her walking again."
There was also some justifiable concern that a Do-Not-Hospitalize order would mean Do-Not-Treat.  Some people were concerned that the order may be too limiting - that there would be some situations where hospitalization would be appropriate, like for hip-fracture:
"I could not imagine my mother  falling and breaking her hip and not going to the hospital...Because I think that would be very painful for her.  And [it] would be cruel.  And someone could say well what's the difference between having pneumonia and not going to the hospital and breaking an arm and not going to the hospital.  And I don't know that I can answer that except in my mind there is a difference..."
We wrote about this exact scenario in a piece for JAMA Internal Medicine recently - an elderly women with dementia falls and breaks her hip, her advance directive states Do-Not-Hospitalize, but her doctor and surrogate feel hospitalization and surgery give her the best chance of recovery of function and quality of life. (See blog posts here and here with lots of discussion and disagreement about our recommendations)

There are two issues here.  The first is the need for doctors to ascertain and document the degree of flexibility or leeway that patients give proxies for situations like this.  For example, "I don't want to be hospitalized for any reason.  Period.  If I break my hip, just keep me  comfortable in the nursing home."  Or, "Let my husband decide.  No one can predict for sure what will happen in the future.  Do I want to stay out of the hospital?  Yes, of course.  But I can't say never."

The second major issue is the suboptimal understanding of health care proxies of nursing home residents with advanced dementia about prognosis and risks and benefits of hospitalization.  In many cases, this misunderstanding results from a proxy-clinician communication failure.

Plenty of room for improvement.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Elderly patients frequently suffer from delirium when hospitalized. When my husband's doctor informed us of this, my children and I decided against having him undergo surgery for the broken hip he had sustained in his nursing home. At age 89 he was not demented but had suffered from severe depression for a long time. He certainly did not need further mental illness. Now, at 91, though confined to a reclining wheelchair he still enjoys visits, including outings on the home's grounds.
Would he have survived nearly two years after surgery and hospitalization? Several of his friends in the facility did not.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …