Skip to main content

10 Serious Illnesses & the Number of Times "Palliative Care" Was Mentioned In Wikipedia #HPM



Every time I listen or talk to Diane Meier I get inspired.  Today was no different.  She inspired me to do a quick search looking for how closely wikipedia articles on serious illnesses align with the current CAPC definition of palliative care.  I thought this may be tough, as I was trying to figure out how to judge different definitions of palliative care.    I was wrong.  Dead wrong.  It was shockingly easy as most articles on the ten life threatening illness that I looked up NEVER even mentioned palliative care.  The ones that did were mostly talking about palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

10 Serious Illnesses and the Number of Times "Palliative" or "Palliative Care" Was Mentioned in Wikipedia

1. Breast Cancer: No mention of the word palliative (really, zero.  Check for yourself)

2. Prostate Cancer: the word palliative used twice, both times talking about how treatments would be "palliative and not curative”. No other mention of palliative care

3. Pancreatic cancer: palliative mentioned twice, both times referring to palliative chemotherapy

4. Colon Cancer: Palliative care seems to be either a surgical intervention or radiation, although it did have a section in the article devoted to it.  This is what is said in the section:
In people with incurable colorectal cancer, palliative care can be considered for improving quality of life. Surgical options may include non-curative surgical removal of some of the cancer tissue, bypassing part of the intestines, or stent placement. These procedures can be considered to improve symptoms and reduce complications such as bleeding from the tumor, abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction.[62] Non-operative methods of symptomatic treatment include radiation therapy to decrease tumor size as well as pain medications.[63]

5. Lung Cancer: has a section on palliative care. This is it:
In people with terminal disease, palliative care or hospice management may be appropriate.[10] These approaches allow additional discussion of treatment options and provide opportunities to arrive at well-considered decisions[97][98] and may avoid unhelpful but expensive care at the end of life.[98] Chemotherapy may be combined with palliative care in the treatment of the NSCLC. In advanced cases, appropriate chemotherapy improves average survival over supportive care alone, as well as improving quality of life.[99] With adequate physical fitness, maintaining chemotherapy during lung cancer palliation offers 1.5 to 3 months of prolongation of survival, symptomatic relief, and an improvement in quality of life, with better results seen with modern agents.[100][101] The NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group recommends if the recipient wants and can tolerate treatment, then chemotherapy should be considered in advanced NSCLC.[88][102]

6. Ovarian Cancer: "palliative" is never mentioned

7. Liver Cancer: “palliative" mentioned once:
"Radiotherapy may be used in the adjuvant setting or for palliative treatment of cholangiocarcinoma"

8. Multiple Myeloma: zero mentions of the word palliative

9. Dementia: the word palliative is NEVER mentioned

10. Alzheimers Disease: the word palliative was mentioned twice, both times referring to available treatments offering "relatively small symptomatic benefit but remain palliative in nature."


What do we do about this?

I'm planning to work with folks at CAPC and AAHPM (through the External Awareness Committee) to fix this.  If you are interested in joining us, please email me.  This will need to be a group effort!

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)

Comments

It’ shocking to see what you’ve found but inspiring to hear of plans to update it. For the Natural Death Centre charity I regularly update the ‘Natural Burial’ wiki page and once you’ve done a couple of updates it becomes easy and fairly quick. I’ve found the Wiki guides straight forward to follow.

Now as you’re on a mission to promote access to information and credible information then whether you would consider promoting ‘open access’ to academic papers for the public via @OA_Button which has just been launched.
Good luck on the mission ......

Susan (NDC Trustee)
WP:MEDRS said…
Before you "fix" this, you should announce your intentions at WikiProject Medicine. There you can find people experienced with writing medical articles on Wikipedia who can help.

On Wikipedia, there are very strict referencing requirements for medical articles.

Eric Widera said…
Great ideas. I really like talking with the WikiProject Medicine. I've heard James Heilman, MD talk about the project. Looks like we also have an elective course at UCSF on it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/UCSF_Elective_2013
dspacl said…
Interesting the NSCLC mentions 1.5-3 month survival advantage with palliative chemotherapy, but no mention of a similar result from palliative care consultation as in Temel et.al. I can't say that the conspicuous absence of any sagacious reference to palliative care is the least bit surprising, after all it is not "active treatment", whatever that means, it obviously doesn't include palliative care. If others define the terms, we will never win the debate. I always get a chuckle from asking residents what they are talking about when they say the "patient is palliative". What follows is usually some stammering as they struggle to come up with the distinguishing features of such a label. That's when they say the patient is not for "active treatment". Then I ask them what that means, more stammering; you know, they say, we have withdrawn care. Why would you ever do that? I ask, more stammering. They hear these terms thrown about the hospital and can't really say what they mean, but are thoroughly imbued with the attitude that palliative care is not treatment.

I hope your efforts are fruitful. I am happy to help in any way. Cheers!
PalliNP said…
Great post! Shocking, but are we really surprised? I'm glad you looked, now let's change the conversation.

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Advice for the End of Life: A Podcast with BJ Miller

This week we talk with BJ Miller, hospice and palliative care physician, public speaker, and now author with Shoshana Berger of the book "A Beginner's Guide to the End."

As we note on the podcast, BJ is about as close as we get to a celebrity in Hospice and Palliative Care.  His TED Talk "What Really Matters at the End of Life" has been viewed more than 9 million times.  As we discuss on the Podcast, this has changed BJ's life, and he spends most of his working time engaged in public speaking, being the public "face" of the hospice and palliative care movement.

The book he and Berger wrote is filled to the brim with practical advice.  I mean, nuts and bolts practical advice.  Things like:
How to clean out not only your emotional house but your physical house (turns out there are services for that!)Posting about your illness on social media (should you post to Facebook)What is the difference between a funeral home and mortuaryCan I afford to die?  …

Improving Advance Care Planning for Latinos with Cancer: A Podcast with Fischer and Fink

In this week's GeriPal podcast we talk with Stacy Fischer, MD and Regina Fink, RN, PhD, both from the University of Colorado, about a lay health navigator intervention to improve advance care planning with Latinos with advanced cancer.  The issue of lay health navigators raises several issues that we discuss, including:
What is a lay health navigator?What do they do?  How are they trained?What do lay health navigators offer that specialized palliative care doesn't?  Are they replacing us?What makes the health navigator intervention particularly appropriate for Latinos and rural individuals?  For advance care planning? Eric and I had fun singing in French (yes French, not Spanish, listen to the podcast to learn why).
Enjoy! -@AlexSmithMD




You can also find us onYoutube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher

Transcript

Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: And Alex, I'm really excited about toda…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …