Skip to main content

10 Serious Illnesses & the Number of Times "Palliative Care" Was Mentioned In Wikipedia #HPM



Every time I listen or talk to Diane Meier I get inspired.  Today was no different.  She inspired me to do a quick search looking for how closely wikipedia articles on serious illnesses align with the current CAPC definition of palliative care.  I thought this may be tough, as I was trying to figure out how to judge different definitions of palliative care.    I was wrong.  Dead wrong.  It was shockingly easy as most articles on the ten life threatening illness that I looked up NEVER even mentioned palliative care.  The ones that did were mostly talking about palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

10 Serious Illnesses and the Number of Times "Palliative" or "Palliative Care" Was Mentioned in Wikipedia

1. Breast Cancer: No mention of the word palliative (really, zero.  Check for yourself)

2. Prostate Cancer: the word palliative used twice, both times talking about how treatments would be "palliative and not curative”. No other mention of palliative care

3. Pancreatic cancer: palliative mentioned twice, both times referring to palliative chemotherapy

4. Colon Cancer: Palliative care seems to be either a surgical intervention or radiation, although it did have a section in the article devoted to it.  This is what is said in the section:
In people with incurable colorectal cancer, palliative care can be considered for improving quality of life. Surgical options may include non-curative surgical removal of some of the cancer tissue, bypassing part of the intestines, or stent placement. These procedures can be considered to improve symptoms and reduce complications such as bleeding from the tumor, abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction.[62] Non-operative methods of symptomatic treatment include radiation therapy to decrease tumor size as well as pain medications.[63]

5. Lung Cancer: has a section on palliative care. This is it:
In people with terminal disease, palliative care or hospice management may be appropriate.[10] These approaches allow additional discussion of treatment options and provide opportunities to arrive at well-considered decisions[97][98] and may avoid unhelpful but expensive care at the end of life.[98] Chemotherapy may be combined with palliative care in the treatment of the NSCLC. In advanced cases, appropriate chemotherapy improves average survival over supportive care alone, as well as improving quality of life.[99] With adequate physical fitness, maintaining chemotherapy during lung cancer palliation offers 1.5 to 3 months of prolongation of survival, symptomatic relief, and an improvement in quality of life, with better results seen with modern agents.[100][101] The NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group recommends if the recipient wants and can tolerate treatment, then chemotherapy should be considered in advanced NSCLC.[88][102]

6. Ovarian Cancer: "palliative" is never mentioned

7. Liver Cancer: “palliative" mentioned once:
"Radiotherapy may be used in the adjuvant setting or for palliative treatment of cholangiocarcinoma"

8. Multiple Myeloma: zero mentions of the word palliative

9. Dementia: the word palliative is NEVER mentioned

10. Alzheimers Disease: the word palliative was mentioned twice, both times referring to available treatments offering "relatively small symptomatic benefit but remain palliative in nature."


What do we do about this?

I'm planning to work with folks at CAPC and AAHPM (through the External Awareness Committee) to fix this.  If you are interested in joining us, please email me.  This will need to be a group effort!

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)

Comments

It’ shocking to see what you’ve found but inspiring to hear of plans to update it. For the Natural Death Centre charity I regularly update the ‘Natural Burial’ wiki page and once you’ve done a couple of updates it becomes easy and fairly quick. I’ve found the Wiki guides straight forward to follow.

Now as you’re on a mission to promote access to information and credible information then whether you would consider promoting ‘open access’ to academic papers for the public via @OA_Button which has just been launched.
Good luck on the mission ......

Susan (NDC Trustee)
WP:MEDRS said…
Before you "fix" this, you should announce your intentions at WikiProject Medicine. There you can find people experienced with writing medical articles on Wikipedia who can help.

On Wikipedia, there are very strict referencing requirements for medical articles.

Eric Widera said…
Great ideas. I really like talking with the WikiProject Medicine. I've heard James Heilman, MD talk about the project. Looks like we also have an elective course at UCSF on it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/UCSF_Elective_2013
dspacl said…
Interesting the NSCLC mentions 1.5-3 month survival advantage with palliative chemotherapy, but no mention of a similar result from palliative care consultation as in Temel et.al. I can't say that the conspicuous absence of any sagacious reference to palliative care is the least bit surprising, after all it is not "active treatment", whatever that means, it obviously doesn't include palliative care. If others define the terms, we will never win the debate. I always get a chuckle from asking residents what they are talking about when they say the "patient is palliative". What follows is usually some stammering as they struggle to come up with the distinguishing features of such a label. That's when they say the patient is not for "active treatment". Then I ask them what that means, more stammering; you know, they say, we have withdrawn care. Why would you ever do that? I ask, more stammering. They hear these terms thrown about the hospital and can't really say what they mean, but are thoroughly imbued with the attitude that palliative care is not treatment.

I hope your efforts are fruitful. I am happy to help in any way. Cheers!
PalliNP said…
Great post! Shocking, but are we really surprised? I'm glad you looked, now let's change the conversation.

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Delirium: A podcast with Sharon Inouye

In this week's GeriPal podcast we discuss delirium, with a focus on prevention. We are joined by internationally acclaimed delirium researcher Sharon Inouye, MD, MPH. Dr Inouye is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Aging Brain Center in the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife.

Dr. Inouye's research focuses on delirium and functional decline in hospitalized older patients, resulting in more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles to date. She has developed and validated a widely used tool to identify delirium called the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and she founded the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) to prevent delirium in hospitalized patients.

We are also joined by guest host Lindsey Haddock, MD, a geriatrics fellow at UCSF who asks a great question about how to implement a HELP program, or aspects of the program, in a hospital with limited resources.  


You can also find us on Youtube!


Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes…

Are Palliative Care Providers Better Prognosticators? A Podcast with Bob Gramling

Estimating prognosis is hard and clinicians get very little training on how to do it.  Maybe that is one of the reasons that clinicians are more likely to be optimistic and tend to overestimate patient survival by a factor of between 3 and 5.  The question is, aren't we better as palliative care clinicians than others in estimating prognosis?  This is part of our training and we do it daily.   We got to be better, right? 

Well, on todays podcast we have Bob Gramling from the Holly and Bob Miller Chair of Palliative Medicine at the University of Vermont to talk about his paper in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (JPSM) titled “Palliative Care Clinician Overestimation of Survival in Advanced Cancer: Disparities and Association with End of Life Care”.

Big findings from this JPSM paper include that we, like all other clinicians, are an optimistic bunch and that it actually does impact outcomes.   In particular, the people whose survival was overestimated by a palliative care c…