Skip to main content

The Business of Selling Hope Part II: Direct-to-Consumer Cancer Center Advertising




The majority of cancer patients with incurable stage IV lung or colon cancer think that the chemotherapy they are receiving might cure them.  This was the finding of a study that we discussed in a previous GeriPal post.  Much was discussed about the failure of prognosis communication and the potential role that denial played in the outcome of this study.  But open up a magazine or turn on the TV and you find some other force at play, one that is in the business of selling hope and fear.  One that is best summed up by the following quote from a cancer center advertisement:
“My doctor back home gave me ONLY a few weeks to live. That's when I made the ONE decision that saved my life. I went to [X cancer center]. That was seven years ago. And counting”
We have written about potentially deceptive cancer center advertisments like this in the past, but a recent Annals of Internal Medicine article for the first time helps quantify the practices that these centers are using to bring in patients and referrals.  The authors set out to characterize the informational and emotional content of direct-to-consumer cancer center advertisements. They looked at local and national advertisements in the top 269 U.S. consumer magazines and on 44 television networks in 2012 to evaluate:
  • What types of clinical services these cancer centers promoted to consumers, including whether supportive services were address (including nutritional services, complementary and alternative therapies, spiritual services, psychosocial services, physical or occupational therapy, and palliative care).
  • Whether they addressed the risks, benefits, costs, and insurance availability when discussing clinical services.
  • Whether they used an emotional appeals in their advertising.
  • Whether they used patient testimonials.

What they found

The authors found in their sample that 102 cancer centers included the following content in their direct-to-consumer advertising:
  • Types of clinical services promoted
    • It probably comes at no big surprise that treatments are most often promoted (88%) compared to screening screening (18%) or supportive services (13%). Sadly, only 2% of advertisements mentioned palliative care or symptom management services (e.g. “pain management”)
  • The amount of information provided about these clinical services
    • Again, not a big surprise here either. Benefits of advertised therapies were described a whole lot more than risks (27% vs. 2%). Importantly though, when benefits were described, they were rarely quantified (2%), and no advertisements quantified risks. It was only the rare cancer center advertisement that mentioned coverage or costs (5%), and none mentioned specific insurance plans.
  • The use of emotional advertising appeals 
    • Emotional appeals ruled the day (81% of adverts). The majority (61%) used language that evoked hope (i.e. “your last hope”). 41% of adverts used used fighting or battle language (“I fought, I won.”). 30% evoked fear (“I didn't know if anyone survived pancreatic cancer.”) On the bright side though as I thought it would be much worse, slightly less than a third discussed patient comfort, compassion, symptom management, or quality of life
  • Patient testimonials 
    • Nearly one half of advertisements included patient testimonials, which were usually focused on survival, rarely included disclaimers (15%), and never described the results that a typical patient may expect.

Take Home Point

Cancer centers, even the most prestigious and academic ones, have positioned themselves to be in the business of selling hope.  If you don't believe this study, just do a quick youtube search for both subtle and not so subtle references that play on both hope and fear:

Cancer Center #1: "I was given three months to live..."


Cancer Center #2: "Good morning cancer, watch your back."


Cancer Center #3: "Your best chance of winning is here"


Cancer Center #4: Man with pancreatic cancer: "The five year survival rate is single digits, and here it is eight years later."



by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)

Comments

Andrew Kamell said…
Excellent point. The emotional appeal, the outside chance, the implications that "our care" is so much better than theirs, the war metaphors, etc., are all very misleading to people who are looking for some other message than what they are hearing from their docs. Tough, as neither group has incentive to change.
As an aside, I do have one suggestion. I never let people get away with talking about "Hope" generically; I always ask "Hope for what?" Hope can be for so many things in addition to cure of cancer/ avoidance of death. In fact, if hope is about not dying, we are all hopeless! thanks again
usman khatri said…
One that is best summed up by the following quote from a cancer center advertisement:cheap maternity dresses evening wear

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Advance Care Planning before Major Surgery: A Podcast with Vicky Tang

This week's podcast is all about the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, advanced care planning and surgery with our guest Dr. Vicky Tang.  Vicky is an assistant professor and researcher here at UCSF.  We talk about her local and national efforts focused on this intersection, including:
Her JAMA Surgery article that showed 3 out of 4 older adults undergoing high risk surgery had no advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Prehab clinics and how ACP fits into these clinicsThe Geriatric Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program whose goal is to set the standards for geriatric surgical care including ACP discussions prior to surgeryHow frailty fits in and how to assess it (including this paper from JAGS on the value of the chair raise test) So take a listen and check out some of those links.  For those who want to take a deeper dive into how GeriPal and surgery fit together, check out these other podcasts: Zara Cooper on Trauma Surgery, Geriatrics, and Palliative Car…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …