Skip to main content

Hospice patients should have access to physical therpay to improve function



by: Alex Smith, @alexsmithMD

I'm going to acknowledge up front that this is a rant. 

One of the skilled nursing facilities I work with has a hospice unit.  We occasionally have patients on the hospice unit who might benefit from physical therapy.  The physical therapists that see patients in the skilled nursing facility say they will talk with the patient about their goals, and if their goals are to maintain their current level of functioning, they will work with the patient.  If the goals are to improve their physical function, they cannot offer that type of support.

This seems ridiculous!

If someone has pain, we don't say, "we will keep your level of pain where it is, but we can't  help you if you want to improve."

If someone has social or spiritual issues, we don't say, "we want to maintain your current level of distress, but can't help you if you want to be less distressed."

Why is this happening?  It may be that a part of the problem has to do with resource allocation.  The physical therapists don't have the resources, nor are they reimbursed for their time the same way, for seeing hospice patients as for patients cared for under the Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility benefit, a comparatively high payment.

Another part - and this may be related - is that we don't prioritize functional improvement as much as symptom/social/spiritual improvement for hospice patients.  I gues the idea is that hospice patients will inexorably decline functionally and die.  It's as if physical therapy to improve funciton has been lumped in with life-sustaining treatments.  When did that happen?  Did I miss a meeting?

Granted, most patients on hospice will have an inexorable decline in physical function - something we've written about both on the blog and in journals.  And many hospice patients do not have the ability or motivation to participate in physical therapy to the extent needed to recover function.  Wanting extensive physical therapy to recover function, when there is no possibility of recovery, is often a red flag that goals of care and prognosis need to be discussed in more depth.

But to me hospice, at it's core, is about making each day as good as it can be, for the time that remains.  Being as indepent as possible is an important part of quality of life for many people.  And for a very small number of people in hospice, there is a potential for recovery of some function. 

I have a patient now who might benefit.  He's been delirious in the hospital, but is pulling out of it.  He might benefit from physical therapy to recover some of the additional disability he acquired from lying in bed in the hospital confused for days on end.  Though his family is starting to discuss hospice, they want him to have the best opportunity to improve funcitonally.  I think they're going to say no to hospice.  And that's unfortunate.  Our system should be flexible enough to accomodate him.

OK, I'm done ranting.  Maybe your hospice is different?  Or maybe you want to rant too?  Let's hear it.

Comments

Winnie Suen said…
Ok, Alex, your rant has motivated me to write! I completely agree with you. I wish hospices would offer more physical therapy for patients that can benefit and that it would be part of the care plan. Maintaining or trying to improve function is important to quality of life. We definitely have patients we send under their skilled benefit who are hospice eligible because of the desire for some physical/ occupational/ speech therapy. If only the payment structure would allow for that...I agree that our system should be structured to accomodate the needs and goals of the patients. Feels good to rant...
Alex Smith said…
Thanks for writing Winnie! Rant away, and let us know if you want to post.
Thank you for ranting about PT for hospice. (I warn on my blog when it's a rant.)PT has become a luxury for anyone of a certain age even if not hospitalized. I'm still fighting the battle a year and a half after lumbar fusion (and still weak.)
Fire, flood, whatever - anything anyone can do for himself is vital.
Andrew Kamell said…
I've always been able to convince hospices I work for to provide at least 2-3 visits to eval and teach the patient/family/staff what needs to be done for the patient. I do think you would have a hard time convincing the hospices to cover long-term PT/OT except in exceptional circumstances (although one combined home health/hospice near me has done so a couple times with their home health PT/OT's. Have you tried talking to the hospice directly? They are the ones who can decide, since they are the ones who will pay.
Anonymous said…
I appreciate your rant, maybe I should rant myself???
I say a real hybrid course of care is needed!
I am NP, now work as hospitalist, but have extensive gero, hospice and palliative care background. When a hospitalized patient needs PT or ST, for example, has had an acute stroke with hemiparesis and severe dysphagia but wants to be DNR and/or have a comfort care approach, it sends the care provider team into a confused state and they are unable to blend--it's either hospice or full court press- from neurologist on down. It's like the concept of individualized care is too difficult, and then the actual patient, who already coping with a lot is left with hard choices, and that is ridiculous.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Kathleen Rye, NP
Anonymous said…
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I am very happy c/ pt's choosing either hospice or rehab. I have worked c/ several hospice pt's that were dual certified and did not really make any significant progress. In my experience working c/ geriatrics we are usually more guilty of over-utilizing our services than underutilizing and if we add hospice pt's to the mix we are going to exacerbate this situation. That's just my 2 cents based on my experience, I know every pt is different and unique and shoud be treated c/ optimum care and respect, but I am not a proponent for dual care c/ PT and hospice.
Anonymous said…
Completely agree. I am a PT who prefers end of life care but is only able to practice this in the ICU, as the great majority of companies decline to hire or pay PTs for hospice care (trust me--I've been looking). It is the pay structure. There is no reason we cannot increase a person's quality of life just because they are on hospice--fall risk certainly isn't decreasing! PT and hospice are not at odds with one another! For the curious, the philosophy is called rehab in reverse.
Anonymous said…
From the hospice point of view and as a Director who has authorized PT for patients,regulations and payment schemes are the real culprit here. We have to be so careful, give patients quality of life, but if it looks like they are doing too well... they no.longer meet guidelines. We also have to sit by while patients are "skilled to death" because of the reimbursement and the payment of room and board.

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …