Skip to main content

Surgical decision-making for elders: GeriBoards, prehab, and other great ideas

by: Alex Smith, @alexsmithMD

A while back people realized that outcomes of surgery in older people were probably better than previously believed. This led to a widespread perception that we were being ageist by not being aggressive enough in offering surgery to older adults.  We started operating on more older adults. We identified new ways to operate on increasingly elderly and frail patients.  If you look into geriatric surgery now, you will mostly find a bunch of stuff about how to optimize surgery for elders.  (Example - I was recently asked to review the orthopedic surgeon society's new guidelines on management of hip fracture.  It was all about this surgical approach or that approach, this screw or that piece of hardware, with almost nothing about the decision to have surgery or not.)

However, there is a new group of physicians researchers who are concerned that the pendulum has swung too far.  They are concerned that we are performing too many surgeries on high risk older adults.  These surgeries too frequently result in poor outcomes that older adults care about, like death or loss of functional ability.  And too often, these surgeries take place with too little thought and deliberation by the referring physician and surgeon about the decision to have surgery or not. 

This post identifies some of the superstars in this new group and summarizes some of their great ideas about how to address this issue:
  1. Emily Finlayson is a colorectal surgeon at UCSF who has published a number of studies calling into question the thoughtfulness of surgical decision making for nursing home residents.  Mortality for major abdominal surgery is far higher for nursing home residents than non-nursing home residents and functional status declines markedly following surgery for nursing home patients treated with surgery for colon cancer.  Emily is designing a new "prehab" clinic for frail older adults undergoing elective surgery.  This prehab clinic will include a Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment and goals of care discussion by a geriatrician, with triggers for referral to palliative care. 
  2. Gretchen Schwarze is a vascular surgeon at the University of Wisconsin who has described two fascinating phenomena in surgery: (1) "buy in", or the unspoken pact that surgeon's feel they have made with patients to not deviate from an all out push to recover from surgery in the first 30 days post-op, including a refusal to listen to patient or family demands to stop life-support; and (2) problems with the "fix it" metaphor for surgical decision making.  Gretchen posted about fix it on GeriPal.  She also described a novel approach to surgical decision making using the "best case" and "worst case" scenario, including a visual of the surgeon's best guess of where the patient will end up on that spectrum.
  3. Mark Neuman is an anesthesiologist at the University of Pennsylvania who is the only anesthesiologist I know interested in health services research and geriatrics.  Fascinating!  We should have more.  He published the terrific piece on hip fracture in nursing home residents Eric wrote about for GeriPal last month.  Mark was also senior author of this awesome perspective for NEJM about a radical redesign of surgical decision making for high risk elders (first author Laurent Glance, MD, U Rochester).  My favorite idea from this perspective: GeriBoards.  We have multidisciplinary tumor boards for patients with cancer, including the surgeon, oncologist, and other care provders. Doesn't it seem logical that we should have multidisciplinary geriatric surgery boards?  The primary care doctor or geriatrician, who has a long relationship with the patient, can weigh in on the big picture, the anesthesiologist can weigh in about the risks from their perspective, and PT/OT can weigh in about the realistic potential for recovery of function.  They can deliberate together and follow the patient as a team.  Yes!  We should be doing that.
  4. Zara Cooper is a trauma surgeon certified in palliative medicine at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston focused on decision making for older adults and seriously ill patients with life threatening surgical conditions.  Zara is working with Rachelle Bernacki, Susan Block, and Atul Gawande to develop a structured "check list" based approach to surgical decision making for high risk patients. 

Comments

Plastic surgery said…
This content provides me more useful information about the health. Actually everyone try to keep her his health. I am very useful because I needed to know this type of heath related write up to know.
Anonymous said…
Excellent point, plastic surgery
Helen Chen, MD said…
"Prehab" what a great concept!

I also want to make a pitch for better attention to function and mobilization when patients are in acute care. There seems to be some vast transmogrifying machine in some inpatient units that takes people who were able to ambulate in the community and turns them, after a 3 day qualifying stay, into patients who are unsafe for discharge home and need "SNF". Yes, I know that sometimes this is because of their underlying medical issue(s) but perhaps their medical issue is sometimes us and the culture of the med-surg unit.
Anonymous said…
Palllitive-hospice thought.....Do these elderly nursing home patients have any voice in choosing urgent operative interventions? Would it be too idealistic to have all nursing home patients have "five wishes" on file in their charts on admission?

Retired General Surgeon SC
Amy Getter said…
Can I say a resounding YES in agreement to the comment ensuring all nursing home patients have 5 wishes on file...and can we begin to have more in-depth conversations about all the pros and cons involved in every health care decision for every patient who should understand fully what they are agreeing to?
Amy G Hospice nurse

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …