Skip to main content

The Advanced Direct Care Worker - A New Profession for a Growing Older Population




With 10,000 Baby Boomers turning 65 every day, the fastest growing jobs in the country are also some of the most critical to ensuring quality of care for older adults: the direct care workforce.

The Department of Labor says personal care aide and home health aide positions are the second and third fastest-growing occupations in the country. These occupations also provide between 70 and 80 percent of paid hands on care for older adults and individuals with disabilities. Of the 30 fastest growing occupations, they are also the two least paying (with an average annual median wage in 2012 of $19,900 and $20,800, respectively). Because of low wages, lack of benefits, and often-strenuous work, the vacancy and turnover rates for direct care work is high. It’s estimated that turnover rates amongst home care workers are between 44 and 65 percent. This occurs right at the time when we must be strengthening the workforce to care for older adults, nearly 90 percent of whom want to age at home.

How can we meet the market demands for more care at home and ensure this critical workforce is respected and recognized for their contribution? The Eldercare Workforce Alliance, in a recently released brief, offers one proposal. While not a cure-all, the creation of an Advanced Direct Care Worker position – a rung in the career ladder above home health or personal care aides - may help to address the challenges we face in providing quality care to older adults across all settings.

Created in response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine report, Retooling for an Aging America, the Alliance, through the vision of our diverse 30 member organizations, seeks to find ways we can ensure all older adults - now and in the future - receive quality care from a well-trained and coordinated interdisciplinary care team. We believe that every person caring for older adults should be trained to understand the unique social, physical, and mental health needs of older adults. To do so, especially in light of the aging of America, we must ensure all health care providers are working at the top of their skill set.

Through roundtable discussions and an online survey, nurses, social workers, physicians, and family caregivers explored the potential role an Advanced Direct Care Worker could play in filling gaps in care and promoting efficient care delivery. After analyzing feedback from the multidisciplinary groups, the Alliance concluded that with the proper training, support, and supervision, an Advanced Direct Care Worker may be able to perform more advanced tasks, assist with navigating the health care system or identifying community resources, or be specifically trained to care for individuals with dementia or palliative care needs. Such roles may help to alleviate family caregiver stress and promote full utilization of other team members’ skills.

As an example in the brief notes: Family caregivers may need to rush home from work at lunchtime to administer medication or a tube feeding that direct care workers are prohibited from administering. Hiring a nurse to perform these procedures, typically performed several times a day, is neither feasible nor efficient. Therefore, allowing nurses to train and delegate these tasks to an Advanced Direct Care Worker could ease the burden on family caregivers.

This brief is just a first step. Many state scope of practice laws will affect what role Advanced Direct Care Workers will be able to play. But testing out these roles will be essential to recruiting and retaining a workforce that will become more and more important as the population of older adults increases to 20 percent of the population by 2030, the most older adults our nation has ever seen. In addition to supporting the existing direct care workforce, we must also make sure all people providing care to older adults are competent in geriatrics or gerontology.

As we look at ways in which we can improve quality of care, let us consider this opportunity to both meet the needs of our nation’s seniors and value the role of direct care workers.

By: Nancy Lundebjerg and Michèle Saunders DMD, MS, MPH

Comments

Yes, scarcity. Result: some badly trained workers turning up at homes.
Another result: In metro areas, due to traffic and strange scheduling, some patients are trapped at home for five hours, unable to use the phone while waiting for new on when the health worker might show up.
Ann Neumann said…
So pleased to see GeriPal and other groups taking up this important issue! While I completely agree that we need more care in the home for seniors (see AHCJ's post today about a new report on seniors' unmet needs http://healthjournalism.org/blog/2014/09/new-millbank-report-highlights-seniors-unmet-care-needs/) but I'm not sure how seniors will be able to afford it. In part, home care workers' pay is so low because seniors pay out of pocket. Even hospice only covers a few hours a day, which isn't nearly enough for most. Some of the home care workers I know get paid cash, under the table, and very little! Yet they're incredibly skilled under the toughest conditions and schedules (including elder patients who are discriminatory, fickle, demented). I don't see a way to better train and pay these home workers until examine the pay structure for in-home care. Please tell me what I'm missing.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …