Skip to main content

Handshakes, handholding, and other dangerous methods of transmitting bacteria



by: Alex Smith @AlexSmithMD

In a recent study in the American Journal of Infection Control, researchers coated a gloved hand in e. coli.  One person with the e coli glove then they shook hands, high-fived, and fist bumped another person with a sterile glove.  Transfer of e coli to the sterile glove was measured.

Results:

  • Highest transfer of bacteria: Handshake
  • Lowest transfer of bacteria: Fist bump (high five was in the middle)
  • Difference: Fist bump less than 10% of bacteria transmitted compared to the handshake
  • Explanation: handshakes have the greatest surface area in contact, for a longer time

This has been a practice changing finding for me.  Rarely are articles practice changing.  After reading these findings, I admit, I have shaken hands less.

I have not yet tried to fist bump my patients.  "Hey, I'm your palliative care doctor, punch it in there!  Knuckles!"

I use hand sanitizer before and after each visit, and also wash with soap and water after every third or so encounter.  But I used to shake hands with pretty much every patient, on every single visit, at both the beginning and end of each visit.  And with each family member.  I now generally only shake hands at the initial visit.

Isn't this sad, in a way?  I was happy when ties where found to carry the most germs of any piece of a doctor's outfit.  I hated ties anyway.  But the fist bump beating the handshake?

Has it come to this?

Have we really taken the touch of out medicine to the extent that it will soon be verboten to shake hands?  If shaking hands spreads germs, then a hug is definitely out of the question.  If infectious disease transmission is the only considered factor, then we should just stand in the doorway.  Or communicate with our patients via snapchat.

In geriatrics and palliative care, we probably prize the virtue of caring above all other virtues. We care for our patients by making strong connections with them.

Part of that connection, for many of us, is developed through non-verbal communication, including handshakes, handholding, hugging, and other dangerous methods of transmitting bacteria.

How do you weight these values against this new information about bacteria, amidst a backdrop of increasingly deadly healthcare-related infections?  Even with the terrific success of hand sanitizer initiatives, hands are still a major source of transmission (see this tomb for details).  It's not just about protecting the patient in front of you, but other patients who may have less resilience against bacteria.

Will this information change what you do?

I'm just providing the perspective.

It's in your hands now.

Thanks to longtime GeriPal reader Aunt Sue for the idea for this post.  And for pointing me to this blog, that contains a link to this funny video primer about how to fist bump.





Comments

cerebral e said…
I always feel a little rude washing my hands on the way out of the room immediately after touching a patient but fortunately my hospital now has signs in all the patient rooms telling them to tell their doctors/nurses to do this!

A bigger barrier to the humanity of touch is the long-sleeve plastic gown and gloves we need to wear if the patient is colonised with bugs like VRE, ESBL, MRSA (MRSA not being endemic in my state). Worse is when you have to use droplet precautions and wear a face mask. Communication is difficult when the other person can't see your mouth.
Touch is imperative for many patients. People who have been in relationships, live or lived with loving families, and those who have been lonely - their is magic in touch. Why do you think babies fail to thrive in "warehouse" orphanages? If you have to wash your hands after taking my hand, go right ahead. Even my spine surgeon took my hand after an unpleasant announcement from my roommate came in on the phone.
Ruth Hill said…
We're getting too sterile conscious. Wash your hands judiciously and continue to shake hands with patients. There is so little touching of the sick it is becoming pathetic. We also neglect to give hugs to our elderly. I always hug my senior patients and watch the gleaming smile on their faces when I kiss them on the forehead or cheek.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …