Skip to main content

Who is more likely to get a pacemaker, someone with or without dementia?


It’s pacemaker week here at GeriPal. What’s pacemaker week you ask? It’s a fun filled week of posts on pacemakers. To start us off, let me ask a simple question.  Who is more likely to get a pacemaker, someone with or without dementia?  The answer to that question is answered in a research letter published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine by Nicole Fowler and colleagues.

The study used date from Alzheimer Disease Centers from September 2005 through December 2011 to look at how often cardiac implantable electronic devices are placed among older adults with and without cognitive impairment.

Of the 16,245 participants who had at least one baseline visit and at least 1 follow-up visit in the study period, 45.8% had no cognitive impairment, 21.3% had Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 33% had dementia. Rates of new pacemaker placement in these folks were as follows:
  • 4 per 1000 person-years for participants without cognitive impairment 
  • 4.7 per 1000 person-years for participants with MCI
  • 6.5 per 1000 person-years for participants with dementia

When adjusting for baseline demographics such as age, sex, race, intensity of pacemaker use in the the patients hospital referral region, cardiac comorbidity burden, functional status, and type of dementia, the authors found that:
  • Patients were 1.6 times more likely to receive a pacemaker if they had dementia than if they didn't have any cognitive impairment
  • Patients were 2.9 more likely to receive a pacemaker if they had severe dementia than if they didn't have any cognitive impairment.

So I guess that was a long answer to a simple question.  Now we know a pacemaker is more likely to be placed in someone with dementia (and even more so in someone with severe dementia), our next post will address the issue of what happens when people consider turning them off.

by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)


NOTE:  I'll also be reviewing Katy Butler's book "Knocking on Heaven's Door: The Path to a Better Way of Death" this week. Comment on any of the pacemaker posts this week or talk about it on twitter and you'll be entered into a drawing to win one of the paperback versions (for twitter, just make sure you include @geripalblog in the tweet)


Comments

I would be curious to know how this data correlates with use of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. I see that there is an expected difference in use of these medications between the cohorts of subjects, but more information about the implications would perhaps help clinicians further identify the risk/benefit ration of dementia "treaments." I look forward to seeing more about this in further publications.
Who were making the decision? Patient? DPOA? I guess it makes sense when considering severe dementia and that DPOA is probably making the decision. From my own family experience, I think my father and his sisters would have a hard time making that decision for my grandmother. Personally, I think she would not want one, but my father and aunts, as her children, have a much harder time separating what they want and what she would want.
Eric Widera said…
Jessica, you make a great point about the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Several studies have shown an association not just with bradycardia in those taking these medications, but also an increased risk of pacemaker insertion.
Paula Span said…
I would like to hear some theories, knowing they are only that, about why this might be true.
Liam Farrell said…
I would be wondering about the profit motive; there is money in procedures. Repeat the study in the NHS and that would remove profit as a confounding factor
Eric Widera said…
By the way, here are some studies looking at the association of cholinesterase inhibitors and increased rates of syncope, bradycardia, pacemaker insertion. The key point, discontinue aricept before even thinking about a pacemaker.

1. Syncope and its consequences in patients with dementia receiving cholinesterase inhibitors: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):867-73. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.43.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19433698

2. Cholinesterase inhibitors and incidence of bradycardia in patients with dementia in the veterans affairs new England healthcare system.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(11):1997.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793162

3. Cholinesterase inhibitors and hospitalization for bradycardia: a population-based study. PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000157. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19787032
Sort of like "Shark Week," only with pacemakers?

Really interesting phenomenon - but some theory to guide the process of interpreting the results and planning next steps would be very helpful.

One alternative that you suggest is that it is a consequence of the disease and its treatment - therapeutic cascade.

Alternatively, other comments suggest a "vulnerable patient" combined with mercenary health system interpretation.

I could also imagine that the perceived limitations in self-care for people with dementia would lead to preference for treatments like a pacemaker that at least seem to require less patient participation.

A research letter isn't the place for this kind of differentiation, but I do find myself wishing that medical research like this was more sensitive to the very different interpretations and did more to try to figure out why such phenomena might occur.
Sangeeta Kopardekar said…
Thanks for posting On this topic Eric. This data is so amazingly counterintuitive. I wonder if one of the reasons for more pacemaker placement in people with severe dementia is because dementia is not thought of as a life limiting illness, the way stage iv cancer is considered a life limiting illness in many cases.
Another theory is that pacemakers are not thought about in the same category of interventions as CPR and intubation are, and so there are no discussions around pacemakers similar to discussions about code status.
Bruce Scott said…
Both cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have a risk for bradycardia and/or heart block.

I think that you should strongly consider stopping either of these meds before placing a permanent pacemaker.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …