Skip to main content

Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine: Partners in a Common Mission



Over the past decade, the disciplines of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine have become intellectual cousins. 

Within Palliative Medicine, the recognition that Palliative Medicine is not just about end of life care has been a paradigm shift.   There is now recognition that core skills of Palliative Medicine, including symptom management, communication, and caregiver support are needed throughout the course of serious illness.  While these needs of seriously ill patients transcend age, it is a demographic fact that older persons will be the bulk of persons with these chronic palliative care needs.  So, the population that has long been of interest to Geriatrics is now of great interest to Palliative Medicine. 

Within Geriatrics, we have become consumed with the recognition that most frail older persons have multiple illnesses.  We realize that treating each illness separately, rather than treating the whole patient leads to considerable harm.   Geriatricians strongly advocate for a focus on whole person health outcomes such quality of life and functional status rather than traditional disease metrics.  Geriatricians have been increasingly concerned that traditional treatments focused on each individual diagnosis leads to dangerous levels of overtreatment that can harm patients. 

On the other hand, care that is grounded in an understanding of the patient’s goals, focused on quality of life, functional, and supportive needs of the patient and caregiver is of great benefit.  Kind of sounds like we are getting pretty close to palliative care, doesn’t it?  So a basic competency of Geriatrics is the ability to attend to the palliative needs of frail patients throughout the full course of serious illness

So, given this overlap between the two fields, shouldn’t the next step for each field be to aggressively define and defend its turf?

Two wonderful perspectives, by Jim Pacala and Diane Meier in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, eloquently argue that the answer to this question is an emphatic NO!  These thoughtful perspectives are great reading for those in both fields.

Pacala and Meier implore us to put a laser focus on the needs of seriously ill patients, rather than worry about who has what turf.   Both fields focus on the most vulnerable patients, the 5% of patients who consume 50% of health costs.  Yet for all that money, our health system is utterly failing these vulnerable patients, delivering disjointed, dysfunctional care that does not meet their needs and goals, and often causes harm rather than benefit.   We should of course embrace what is unique about each discipline and value the specialized skills each discipline may bring to the table.  But, Pacala and Meier tell us that we have so much more to gain by collaborating and working together than worrying about turf.

Perhaps the most important feature that unites those in Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine is the passionate belief that we need to change how health care is delivered to seriously ill patients.  With needs so great, we do not need to worry about turf.  There is more than enough work to go around.  By working together, we can offer hope to seriously ill patients and their caregivers who feel that their voices are not being heard. 
by: Ken Covinsky @geri_doc

Comments

Mark said…
In early 2009 my wife Donna was dx with Stage IV cancer she passed away in Aug of 2011. She and I (her caregiver) benefited from the palliative care provided by her oncologist and his team as well as her final weeks in hospice. I have written about these experiences and podcasts. I believe and know first hand what palliative care and hospice provided both the patient and caregiver.

"Palliative Care and the Hospice: A Gift for the Living
http://www.bioc.net/blog-2/2012/6/29/palliative-care-and-the-hospice-a-gift-for-the-living.html?rq=Palliative

"Hospice, Palliative Care and End of Life: Practical Considerations"
http://www.bioc.net/blog/2014/5/22/hospice-palliative-care-and-end-of-life-practical-considerations?rq=Palliative

"Podcast #19: Entering Hospice Dignity in the Face of Fear"
http://www.bioc.net/podcast/2014/9/1/podcast-19-entering-hospice-dignity-in-the-face-of-fear?rq=Palliative

Thank you,
What do you hope a reader/patient will do about this? And please tell us what specific actions are being taken now.
wassdoc said…
Thanks so much for your thoughtful review of this important topic. Reading the article by Doctors Pacala and Meier reminds me of a few key issues that I have seen in the health care marketplace over the past thirty years. First, many of those who started the field of Palliative Care Medicine, came from the field of Geriatrics. They had left the field due to the inability to find satisfactory employment. They also encountered a healthcare system that was not friendly or welcoming to the approach that most Geriatricians took. By honing in on the key elements of Palliative Care in specific patient populations, they were able to provide the type of care that we Geriatricians have always believed in. Palliative Care has managed to grow, but I believe has begun to and will continue to run into many of the same issues that Geriatrics has faced in the marketplace. This is one of the main reasons that Geriatrics and Palliative Care must work arm in arm in working in today's healthcare world. As was also mentioned in the articles, don't forget the long term care and home care physicians, who have also found their unique niches. Unfortunately, by being part of separate organizations in a highly political healthcare environment, the clout of each group is minimized. Articles such as this should be a call to arms for all of us who care for the most vulnerable members of our society to find ways to work together to improve the system.
Sondra Eppard, NHA said…
Thank you Dr. Wasserman, your dedication to our Geriatric population, it was a pleasure to work with you.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …