Skip to main content

Time to act! Urge your senators to confirm Dr. Vivek Murthy for Surgeon General

by: Alex Smith @AlexSmithMD

Vivek Murthy was nominated for Surgeon General of the United States by President Obama in November of 2013.  A bipartisan group of Senators approved his nomination in February 2014 and pushed it forward for a full vote.

A (not so) funny thing happened on the way to the vote.

In his confirmation hearing, Dr. Murthy was asked by Senator Lamar Alexander about his tweet that gun control is a public health issue.

Senator Alexander noted that "Americans have a first amendment right to advocate the second amendment."

Daily Show commentator Jon Stewart responded on his show "Yes, Americans have a first amendment right to advocate the second amendment.  And apparently, you don't have a first amendment right to have a different opinion from that.  Everyone knows the first amendment only applies to saying positive things about the second amendment."

Vivek Murthy responded to Senator Alexander that he would not focus on gun control as surgeon general.  He would focus on obesity.

But it was too late - Murthy had touched the third rail of politics - gun control.  Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky wrote a letter to majority leader Harry Reid saying he would put Dr. Murthy's nomination on hold.  His office bragged that they had "put yet another hold on another qualified nominee."

The NRA attack machine went into full swing, opposing the confirmation. The Surgeon General is an office with no control over gun control legislation.  As editors at the New England Journal of Medicine wrote in support of Vivek Murthy for Surgeon General,

The critical question is this: Should a special-interest organization like the NRA have veto power over the appointment of the nation's top doctor? The very idea is unacceptable.

Unacceptable though it is, the Senate backed off.  Senators from red and purple states, worried about re-election, balked at confirmation.  The vote was put on hold.

Well now those Senators have lost.  And this presents a brief window of opportunity to push through the vote on Dr. Vivek Murthy.  Those senators that lost no longer have a political reason to oppose this nomination in their last month in office.  This is a brief window, folks.

And really, this is not about gun control, or the NRA - all of that is a (ridiculous) distraction.  This should really be about the candidate.   Here are some of Vivek Murthy's qualifications for becoming America's Top Doctor:
  • Harvard undergraduate
  • Yale medical school and MBA
  • Primary care residency at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (where he now works)
  • Founded Doctors for America
  • Founded ePernicus, a social networking and collaboration site for health researchers
  • Co-founded Visions Worldwide, supporting HIV/AIDS education in India
  • Served on the U.S. Presidential Advisory Council on Prevention, Health Promotion, and Integrative and Public Health
  • Support from hundreds of public health organizations, including the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Cancer Society, and the Gerontological Advance Practice Nurses Association.  
  • (I have contacted both the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and the American Geriatrics Society about becoming involved in supporting Dr. Murthy's nomination)
I know Dr. Murthy.  We were in the same small primary care residency at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.  Vivek was one year below me, in a class of four residents per year.  We spent countless hours together in journal club, our patient-doctor course, and on the wards.  Vivek Murthy is one of the most humble, brilliant, innovative, and caring physicians I have ever met.  Vivek Murthy is a fresh face with new ideas for leadership in healthcare.

And this is not really about Republicans and Democrats, either.  Ask yourself this: at this time of healthcare crisis after crisis (think Ebola), can our nation afford to go without leadership from its top doctor, the Surgeon General?  We need thinking at the top that is steady, informed, and sharp, not a leadership vacuum imposed by a single issue special interest group enraged by a tweet.

Please take action.  In just 2 minutes you can email or call your Senator to support Vivek Murthy's confirmation in the Senate.  I did both in about 5 minutes.  Then I asked my wife do it and it took her even less time.  Ask your family and friends to do it.  It's easy - just follow this link.  You can tweet about the issue here.
I can say that as a resident, Vivek Murthy was a strong supporter of geriatrics and palliative care.  In terms of his published views on the internet, he responded to a NEJM perspective by Drs. Thomas Smith and Bruce Hillner on bending the cost curve in cancer.  One of the issues in this area are unnecessary tests for cancer in patients with a short life expectancy, like screening for cancer in those already diagnosed with advanced cancer.  We blogged about this subject in a post called "Dumb Medicine."  In reply to this issue, Dr. Murthy is quoted on Kaiser Health News:
Dr. Vivek Murthy, President of Doctors for America, e-mails that physicians spend less time with patients (not always for reasons of their own choosing) and are less likely to have important discussions with patients and families about priorities or tradeoffs in care. It takes less time to consent to an intervention or to prescribe a medication than it does to persuade a patient that an intervention or procedure is unwise. Murthy notes that one cumulative effect of millions of missed conversations is to reinforce the intervention mindset among patients. So, alongside efforts to alter physician incentives, medical schools and health care settings must equip physicians with the knowledge, the interpersonal skills and other supports to conduct these important conversations well.
Advocacy to train physicians with communication skills, and concern about millions of missed conversations and the "intervention mindset" - doesn't that sound like something GeriPal readers should support?

This window of opportunity will soon pass.  The current Senate breaks for the Holidays soon.  After that, the new Senate with new leadership takes hold.

The time is now.


Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Length of Stay in Nursing Homes at the End of Life

One out of every four of us will die while residing in a nursing home. For most of us, that stay in a nursing home will be brief, although this may depend upon social and demographic variables like our gender, net worth, and marital status. These are the conclusions of an important new study published in JAGS by Kelly and colleagues (many of whom are geripal contributors, including Alex Smith and Ken Covinsky).

The study authors used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to describe the lengths of stay of older adults who resided in nursing homes at the end of life. What they found was that out of the 8,433 study participants who died between 1992 and 2006, 27.3% of resided in a nursing home prior to their death. Most of these patients (70%) actually died in the nursing home without being transferred to another setting like a hospital.

 The length of stay data were striking:

the median length of stay in a nursing home before death was 5 months the average length of stay was l…

Palliative Care in Nursing Homes: Discussion of a Multinational Trial with Lieve Van den Block

Nursing homes are a tough place to do palliative care.  There is extremely high staff turnover, physicians are often not present except for the occasional monthly visit, many residents die with untreated symptoms usually after multiple hospitalizations and burdensome life-prolonging treatments, and specialty palliative care - well that is nowhere to be found in most nursing homes outside of hospice.  So what can we do to improve the palliative care outlook in nursing homes?

On todays podcast we talk with Lieve Van den Block about her recent palliative care intervention that was published in JAMA IM this week.  Lieve led a multicomponent intervention to integrate basic nonspecialist palliative care in in 78 nursing homes located in 7 different European countries.  Just take a moment to grasp the size of this study - 7 counties, 78 nursing homes.  I struggle with just trying to improve palliative care in one site!

We discuss with Lieve the results of the study, her take on why they got…