Skip to main content

A better way to care for frail patients: Independence at Home

Last week the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a report that I think will change how geriatric palliative care will be delivered in the United States.

What is the report?
 CMS released the results from the first performance year of the Independence at Home Demonstration.  The Independence at Home Demonstration  is modeled on the Home Based Primary Care program from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) which brings comprehensive, longitudinal, interdisciplinary primary care into the home setting for patients with complex, chronic, disabling disease.  HPBC has been shown to improve access to care and reduce hospitalizations while also reducing total cost to both the VA and to Medicare.  Patients of HBPC report high satisfaction with access and continuity of care.  Would such care have similar results if offered to a general Medicare patient population who are not veterans??

What were the results of the first performance year of Independence at Home (IAH)?
According to CMS' analysis, all 17 participating practices improved quality in at least three of six quality domains.  Medicare beneficiaries participating in IAH had fewer readmissions within 30 days.  They had less inpatient and emergency department utilization for diabetes, high blood pressure, asthma, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection.

Independence at Home participation resulted in over $25 million in savings in the first performance year.  Given just over 8,400  Medicare beneficiaries enrolled, IAH led to an average of $3,070 savings per participating beneficiary.

Why is this important?

I recently helped care for a frail, older couple.  I took care of one patient, and a colleague cared for the partner.  'Can't you convince them to move to a nursing home,' I was asked. 'They are barely safe at home and it is getting harder and harder for them to come to the clinic.'  As my patient and I discussed the stable but complicated medical situation, the difficulties of  bathing, along with the challenges of 1950's split-level home design, my patient ended our conversation ended as she always has: 'I just want us to be together in our home of fifty years.'*

How do we make care at home viable when being at home is the fundamental goal of the patient?

The move to a nursing home would certainly be a lot easier to implement, but it is not what the patient wants.  Hospice certainly has been a key for helping people stay in home, but what do you do when the 6 month prognosis is not met?

Independence at Home is a model of care that would give my patient exactly what is wanted:  Primary care delivered in the home setting.  It is care that she deserves and given the potential total cost savings, paying for a home based primary care program seems like a wise investment.

What next?

The Independence at Home is still a demonstration.  To become an option for my patient, more time is needed to show the full value of the program.  If the IAH continues to perform like its first year, like the Home Based Primary Care program has for years, then it should become a Medicare Benefit.

For now Congress needs to authorize an extension of the demonstration project. With better quality outcomes and at a lower cost, how could Congress possibly fail to act?

by: Paul Tatum (@doctatum)

* The patient case is an amalgamation of events, and not reflective of one patient

Image from http://www.clker.com/clipart-home-love.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
I agree we need to come up with better models. We are already running out of capacity to provide assisted living, memory care and skilled care. The sheer numbers of aging baby boomers will more than likely strain the system to the utmost.

But as a caregiver for a parent with Alzheimer's, I question how feasible it is to push the model of "home is always best." The medical care is only one piece of the puzzle. There are also enormous social and practical implications involved in keeping an aging adult in their own home.

Who's doing the laundry? Preparing the meals? Ensuring there's an adequate supply of bread, milk, coffee, toilet paper? Picking up the clutter? Sorting the mail and paying the bills? Who's making sure the meds are administered each day and on time? Who's coordinating the medical appointments? Who's taking care of the invisible needs such as foot care? Who's driving then to church on Sundays? What about home maintenance - cutting the grass, changing the furnace filter and so on? What about the emotional needs - are they isolated? Lonely? Bored?

If an older adult is barely managing at home, what happens if there's something unexpected - a fall, a serious stroke, etc., that forces a move into skilled care?

Sure, there are homemaking and nonmedical senior companion services available to meet some of these needs - but it costs $$ out of pocket and many families simply aren't in a financial position to pay for it. Assuming that volunteers can step in is both ludicrous and unsustainable.

I am entirely in favor of honoring the wishes of aging family members. I would walk over burning coals for my mother. But we can't ignore the fact that keeping them in their own home until the end requires a significant family commitment. Certainly it's less costly from a primary care standpoint if you can avoid trips to the ER and unnecessary readmissions, but this is only one measure of the total cost - and frankly it barely registers on the Richter scale for most family caregivers. We're just trying to meet the daily needs without wearing ourselves down into exhaustion.

By all means, primary care at home is a model worth looking into. But it's critical to keep the whole picture in mind.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …