Skip to main content

Is work life balance a first-world privledge problem, or not?

by: Alex Smith, @AlexSmithMD

In geriatrics, and to a much greater extent palliative care, work/life balance is recognized as critical to finding meaning in your work, to being at your peak at work and at home, and to avoiding burnout.


So last week I read with fascination a Washington Post story about pilot program at Stanford that supported physicians work/life balance.  Here's the brief story in bullets:
  • The powers at Stanford realized that many women were dropping out of academic medicine, despite generous leave policies, benefits for part time work, etc. They wondered why. 
  • They hired a firm to investigate.  The firm concluded that the at Stanford culture dictated "all-out devotion to work, all the time."  No one was using the generous family-friendly policies.
  • People were doing all sorts of unfunded work that ate huge chunks of time: mentoring, committee work, extra shifts, etc.
  • Stanford started a pilot program where physicians and basic scientists could use credits from the unfunded work to pay for services such as delivered meals, housecleaning, and assistance with grant writing.
  • The program, per the report, was enormously successful at improving job satisfaction.
My first reaction to this was elation.  Just offering generous policies and flexible scheduling is not enough.  You have to come close to forcing people to attend to their home life.  You have to align your policies to support those who want to work really hard, choose not take the leave, yet still desire a rewarding home life. 


So my bubble of elation was somewhat burst upon reading this reaction by Karen Sibert, an anesthesiologist at UCLA and mother.  You should go read the whole post here, which I will quote briefly:
  • "“work-life balance” is the very definition of a first-world problem, unique to a very privileged class of highly educated people, most of whom are white."
  • "Every day, I go to work and see the example of the nurses and technicians who work right alongside me in tough thoracic surgery cases. Zanetta, for instance, is the single mother of five children. She leaves her 12-hour shift at 7 p.m. and then faces a 60-mile commute to get home. She never complains, and unfailingly takes the extra moment to get a warm blanket for a patient or cheerfully help out a colleague.When I leave work, I see the gardeners who arrive in battered pickup trucks and mow lawns in the Los Angeles summer heat for slim pay and no benefits. I can’t imagine these people wasting time worrying about work-life balance. They’re too busy working."
  • On the Stanford program: "The sheer paternalism of the Stanford program is breathtaking. The assumption, apparently, is that Stanford faculty can’t be trusted to manage their own lives inside and outside of work."
Well.


Dr. Sibert makes some valid points here.  And yet something seems a little off-base about her argument.
  • We should not set our standards for what physicians can be concerned about based on how we treat worst-off groups.  Those who are in less privileged positions should be equally invested and outspoken about work-life balance.  They have at least equal claim to concerns about work-life balance.
  • In fact, I suspect many people who are not in positions of privilege and work long hours, similar to physicians, do worry about it.  They just don't complain about work-life balance to physicians. 
  • I hired a guy in a slim battered pickup truck, such as the one Dr. Sibert describes, to work on my garden.  Because I work all week, I arranged to meet him on a Saturday.  My first preference would have been Sunday, but he was clear: "I work all week, Saturday's too.  Sunday is for my family."  Work life balance.
  • Do nurses really not have any dialogue about work/life balance?   The ones I know well talk about it.  A lot.
  • Some of the physicians I know who are most concerned about work-life balance are not white. 
I suspect that work life balance is a universal concern, not unique to physicians.  Certainly, there is a spectrum that runs from legitimate concern to whining.  Whining sounds particularly grating when it comes from the privileged class.


We could claim exception because we're in geriatrics and palliative care, and are thus at risk for higher rates of burnout due to the exhausting emotional intensity of our work.  But let's set that aside for a moment.  That's the easy road. 


For physicians as-a-whole, where do you think concerns about work-life balance fall on the spectrum of legitimacy/whining? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
One item not mentioned in this article is the role that money plays in work life balance. How much is enough?

Nurses certainly know how much they can earn because most are employees. Who are the people being caught up in Medicare scams? Don't see too many nurses or technicians names in print.

I had a cousin that wanted to go into medicine. When asked why, he said to make money. He became a lawyer instead. And, he has a good work-life balance.

Maybe the whole culture of medicine needs to be reexamined for how and what trainees are exposed to and by the example set by their seniors.
Dan Matlock said…
Interesting Alex!

Work-life balance is a misnomer itself. The term causes problems. My life is multifaceted and work is one facet of that. I've worked very hard to have the opportunity to do work that I find meaningful. I think about home at work and work at home. When I have a bad day at work, my home life suffers. When I go home excited and fulfilled, that flows over into how I treat my family.

My father-in-law worked 40 hours a week and hated it. My wife still resents aspects of that hatred.

The Stanford program is great - but it about supporting multifaceted and busy people and making them feel appreciated, not about this stupid "work-life" balance construct.
Dan Matlock said…
Interesting Alex!

Work-life balance is a misnomer itself. The term causes problems. My life is multifaceted and work is one facet of that. I've worked very hard to have the opportunity to do work that I find meaningful. I think about home at work and work at home. When I have a bad day at work, my home life suffers. When I go home excited and fulfilled, that flows over into how I treat my family.

My father-in-law worked 40 hours a week and hated it. My wife still resents aspects of that hatred.

The Stanford program is great - but it about supporting multifaceted and busy people and making them feel appreciated, not about this stupid "work-life" balance construct.
Stacy Fischer said…
As an academic faculty who is also a woman and a mom, I am grateful that Stanford has taken notice of how many female faculty end up leaving academics. I appreciate their attempt at creative thinking about how to help them. I do not love their solution. I am someone who already outsources nearly all these mundane household tasks. I shop though an app and groceries are delivered, school supplies come form Amazon, I do not clean my own house, and I have a nanny help with some of the after school care. I am not sure I have the ideal solution but I will take some time to reflect further about what would really be helpful.

As far as Karen Sibert's response-I dismiss it. This is not the first tie she has spoken out against work life balance-see her op ed in the NYT 2011 about how as an anesthesiologist no less, she admonishes women in primary care for only working part time. Please.

And to your point Alex-agreed! this indeed is not a white problem. It is an academic problem-first world by its very nature. I mentor several minority faculty and they are burdened even more heavily than I am with these unpaid activities and unfunded demands of their time. As one of a few Latina faculty, my mentee gets asked repeatedly to interview any potential resident of color. I work really hard to help her say no to be able to ficus on her research so that she may be competitive in the future for funding and therefore stay in academics.
Anonymous said…
One other point she does not mention is that as physicians we are responsible for our patients 24/7, whereas a technician goes home and does not continue with charting and answering emergency pages.

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Palliative Care: A Podcast with Diane Meier

There are few names more closely associated with palliative care than Diane Meier.  She is an international leader of palliative care, a MacArthur "genius" awardee, and amongst many other leadership roles, the CEO of the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC).  We were lucky enough to snag Diane for our podcast to talk about everything we always wanted to ask her, including:
What keeps her up at night?Does palliative care need a national strategy and if so why and what would it look like?The history of CAPC and the leadership centersAdvice that she has for graduating fellows who want to continue to move palliative care forward as they start their new careersWhat she imagines palliative care will look like in 10 or 15 years?What is the biggest threat facing palliative care? So take a listen and if you want to dive a little deeper, here are two articles that we discussed during the podcast:
A National Strategy For Palliative Care. Health Affairs 2017Palliative Care Leadership…

Advance Care Planning before Major Surgery: A Podcast with Vicky Tang

This week's podcast is all about the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, advanced care planning and surgery with our guest Dr. Vicky Tang.  Vicky is an assistant professor and researcher here at UCSF.  We talk about her local and national efforts focused on this intersection, including:
Her JAMA Surgery article that showed 3 out of 4 older adults undergoing high risk surgery had no advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Prehab clinics and how ACP fits into these clinicsThe Geriatric Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program whose goal is to set the standards for geriatric surgical care including ACP discussions prior to surgeryHow frailty fits in and how to assess it (including this paper from JAGS on the value of the chair raise test) So take a listen and check out some of those links.  For those who want to take a deeper dive into how GeriPal and surgery fit together, check out these other podcasts: Zara Cooper on Trauma Surgery, Geriatrics, and Palliative Car…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…