Skip to main content

Technology Will Transform Care for Older People: Truth or Hype? (Hint: HYPE)

I seem to keep hearing stories about how fancy new technologies will transform care for older persons.  Living in the Bay Area, it is kind of uncool to not claim excitement about the possibilities.

So, I guess I will avoid admitting that I am just not getting jazzed up about the possibilities.  I suppose one day something transformative will come along.  But, what older people really need, especially those facing the disabilities and frailties of old age, is more high touch.  Not high tech.

Here are a few ideas I have heard pitched over the past year that create a big yawn:

1) Monitoring Grandma and Grandpa:

I suppose many of you have heard this idea.  You are worried about your older parent/grandparent, so you put sensors in their home.  With home monitors, you can now get a text on your iPhone so you know what time Grandma has woken up, when she has eaten, whether she has taken her medicine, when she leaves the house, and when she comes back.  If anything is amiss, you can take action.

Sounds good until you actually think about it.  Problem is that most older people I know would absolutely hate this.  Guess what:  Most seniors don't want to be treated like children by their children.

Come to think of it, we have experience with this idea in a non-Geriatric setting.  Doesn't this kind of sound like the electronic monitoring bracelets used for prisoners on house arrest?

2) The urine pH monitor:

Gotta love this one.   Incontinent patients in nursing homes get lots of urinary tract infections (UTIs).  So, how about putting a pH monitor in their undergarments? Now we will know when their urine pH falls so we can start them on antibiotics earlier.

Small problem:  Nursing home patients often have bacteria in their urine.  But treating asymptomatic patients does no good, but can do lots of harm.  Nursing home patients with bacteria in their urine should only be treated if they have symptoms suggesting a UTI.  This type of device will lead to massive over treatment and antibiotic related complications.  This technology wonder will do nothing to help the problem of nursing home UTIs.  Only members of the Clostridium Difficile Fan Club should like this idea.

3) VA Health Buddy:

This is an example of how a good idea can go bad.  The VA Health System has pushed a device (often called the Health Buddy) that allows patients to monitor all sorts of things, such as blood pressure, more frequently.  This is good for some patients.  But the problem is that the VA made use of the Health Buddy a performance measures, leading to indiscriminate use of these devices.  Many Geriatricians in the VA have grown to really dislike the Health "Buddy."   Patients get the device, and we start monitoring all sorts of things in a frail patient that do not need to be monitored.

In Geriatrics, our goal is to make patients' health problems as little a part of their life as possible.  This means we seek to  manage their health problems with as little disruption to their lives as possible.  But devices like the Health Buddy and other technologies make patients' health problems as much a part of their lives as possible.  Just the wrong direction.

There seems to be a flawed assumption that underlies many of these tech interventions:  That more data on our patients is always good.  But that is a very very wrong assumption.  Not every data point on a patient requires action.  By "finding things early" we often find things that would have caused no distress or harm to patients if left untreated.  But, when we find asymptomatic "abnormalities" we may introduce harmful interventions that convert a non problem into a problem.  And of course the mere collection of data can be intrusive.  It may be easy to design devices to collect more data.  The challenge is to intelligently think about what data need to be collected, and when it makes sense to do something about the data.

My advice to entrepreneurs and venture capitalists:  Think high touch before high tech.  What kinds of innovations will actually improve the quality of life of older people and make them feel better and promote social engagement?  Think about this question before even thinking about technology.  Then and only then, think about how your technology can promote high touch.  Technology that promotes high touch is where the real innovation may lie-and your chance to prove us skeptics wrong.

by: Ken Covinsky @GeriDoc

Comments

Anonymous said…
Amen, Amen, Amen. Having worked 28 years in a nursing home, holding an older persons hand and listening to them does much more for their well being than any other medical intervention I've ever seen. Thank you for this article.
Joanne Lynn said…
I agree on high touch. But perhaps there's an easy role for granny cams and PayPal in helping to support persons living alone - could check up on whether the aide is present, and even whether he or she is being kind (especially useful for persons hallucinating various adverse events). Paying with PayPal would prevent having to have substantial cash around, thus alleviating some of those fears - especially if the aide is being paid by family or friends who do not live in the same home.
Your examples are very useful illustrations of tech gone mad.
I absolutely love this post, Dr. Covinsky, and agree with it 100%. Since their beginning, I have questioned the effectiveness of computer games that tout brain fitness and memory improvement. I'll stick with Gene Cohen's book, The Mature Mind that points to REAL ways to maintain memory and brain fitness. High touch over high tech any day! Thank you.

Kyle Murray said…
We've had this discussion in a lot of Twitter chats regarding Elder Care and healthcare in general. Tech is great, certainly. It provides us info that's easily accessible and shared at a rapid pace. But, simplicity is key. If it's not demonstrably making things better, there's no reason to complicate things. Also, tech/social can be intrusive and the first paragraph makes a great point; seniors don't want to be babied, they want to go about their day. Simple as that.

We have to find a good balance between tech that improves the lives of seniors and makes us more effective as caregivers, but also doesn't impede on the privacy/sense of independence that seniors value.
Sheryl Bass said…
Three million people in the U.S. age 40 and older have low vision. According to 2010 research by the National Eye Institute, the number of Americans with low vision will continue to grow dramatically, from 2.9 million in 2010, to 5 million in 2030, to 8.9 million in 2050, as our population ages. In response, Hadley, the largest provider of distance education for people who are blind or visually impaired worldwide, has launched a series of 10 free audio recordings designed to help those living with low vision maintain their independence. Available through the new Low Vision Focus @ Hadley program the recordings share practical ways to address daily living skills made difficult by vision loss.

The free recordings are available on CD, Digital Talking Book (DTB) cartridge and as free mp3 audio downloads from the Low Vision Focus @ Hadley (LVF) Web site at www.lowvisionfocus.org. Individuals are required to register online to receive access to the free audio recordings or they should call 1-855-830-5355 for the CDs or DTB cartridges. Each recording is approximately 30 minutes long and covers a different aspect of living independently with low vision. This series helps people move forward using step-by-step tips and techniques, along with information and resources to help maximize the vision they have.

Following are the 10 audio lesson topics:

1. Making the Kitchen User Friendly
2. Low Vision Cooking
3. Doing Simple Kitchen Tasks
4. Basic Tactile Marking
5. Simple Home Modifications
6. Getting Around the House
7. Looking Your Best
8. Keeping Prescriptions in Order
9. Going Out for a Meal
10. Going Out with a Friend

Adult children of seniors living with low vision are encouraged to take advantage of the online resources to assist their parents. Caregivers and professionals, especially those working with low vision support groups in local communities, are also encouraged to utilize the resources available through the LVF Web site.

Popular posts from this blog

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …