by: Eric Widera (@ewidera)
If you had to guess what long acting opioid is most commonly started on in nursing home patients, which one would you guess? A new study released last week in JAGS shocked me. The answer to this question was a fentanyl patch. Even more shocking, many of those started on this medication were never prescribed any opioids prior to being started on a patch.
Ok, before I get ahead of myself, let me describe the study. The authors used nursing home data from 22,253 Medicare-enrolled long-stay residents (meaning that they had to have a stay of greater than 90 days). They combined the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Medicare enrollment, hospital claims, and prescription drug transaction data from January to December of 2011 to determine the prevalence of new initiation of a long-acting opioid prescriptions. They excluded residents who were comatose, who did not initiate a long-acting opioid after nursing home admission, or who had less than 3 months of continuous enrollment in Medicare Part D before initiation of a long-acting opioid.
What they found was eye opening:
- One out of ten nursing home residents (9%) were never on a short acting agent in the previous 60 days prior to starting a long acting opioid.
- The most-common initial long-acting opioids was a fentanyl patch, accounting for about half of all long acting opioids for both opioid-naïve and non-naïve patients.
- For those opioid-naïve patients put on fentanyl patches, 27% were placed on a 12 mcg/h patch. 38% were placed on a 25mcg/h patch, and the rest were placed on 50mcg/h or more of a patch.
I have some worry about a blanket statement against the use of long acting opioids without starting a short acting agent first, I do feel that starting a fentanyl patch in an opioid naïve patient is dangerous. My only hope is that the study didn't capture opioid prescriptions that were outside of the Medicare Part D benefit, which is possible but unlikely to account for all of their findings.
Reference
Comments
I think safe titration is a challenge
Would be useful to know others experience with transdermal fentanyl in actively dying patients..do you titrate down, or remove them once patients are unconscious..? Also, do you think that titration up higher than 200mcg is not useful..?
One of the problems that this might be identifying is that as soon as people are identified as dying, or comfort measures, some physicians routinely order things like morphine 2mg/hr or even "2-10mg/hr, titrate to effect," or some other outrageous order. They're dying, so of course they need high doses of opioids, right?
No...
PS please remove the spam comments...
My name is Melissa, sorry I don’t want to share my other names because of those that might know me , I was diagnosed of hiv June 23rd 2007 and I have been living with it ,taking my medications till I went for a counseling section and I met Julia and she brief me on what she saw on a blog about how a herbal doctor cured hiv/aids that she wants to give it a try that I should apply also but out of ignorance I refused ,two weeks later she sent an hiv result which tested that she was negative ,I was so excited and i requested for the contact address and today I am hiv negative , you can contact me on my email (happymelissa@outlook.com) for my result as proof that indeed there is a cure. am not here to do any advert for the Herbal Home that is why i won't mention their name or state their email address or phone number , My brothers and sisters let’s stop the spread of hiv and get a cure .Thanks