Skip to main content

Sex and Aging

Photo by Patrick Q
It’s time to get comfortable with the notion that older Americans have satisfying sexual relationships. Studies on sex and aging confirm that most older adults retain sexual interest and ability. The problem is, as nicely summarized by Mark Lachs in this weekend's Wall Street Journal, that sex in the elderly remains a taboo subject, even among health care professionals.

A landmark study in 2007 by Lindau and colleagues helped disprove the myth that sex is no longer important as we age. They performed survey of 3005 older adults to evaluate the prevalence of sexual activity, behaviors, and problems in this population. The prevalence of sexual activity did decline with age – from 73% among respondents who were 57 to 64 years of age, to 53% among those 65 to 74 years of age, to 26% among those 75 to 85 years of age.

The authors of this study also found that among respondents who were sexually active, about half of both men and women reported at least one bothersome sexual problem. Unfortunately, despite the relatively high prevalence of sexual problems only 38% of men and 22% of women reported having discussed sex with a doctor since turning 50. In the WSJ artile, Dr. Lachs highlights the importance of having discussions about sex:

"These findings are jarring not only because of the quality-of-life issues that are going unaddressed, but also because they have real health consequences. A modest proportion of new HIV infections are now occurring in people over the age of 50. In one study of single, sexually active women over the age of 50, less than half reported that their partners used condoms."

How can we encourage discussions on sexuality in older patients. We need to bring it up. Patients find it easier to discuss sexual concerns if the clinician initiates the conversation. A good starting point is asking the question “are you sexually active?”

We should also make this a routine part of palliative care and hospice. In a 2003 study from the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, partners of individuals on ventilator due to advanced ALS still report sexuality as being important in their relationship, with as many as one-third continued to have sexual intercourse. In another qualitative study, only one out of the 10 individual seen by a palliative care service had previously been asked about sexuality, yet all felt that it should have been brought up.

So, here is a question to the audience - do you bring up sexuality when talking with patients?

by: Eric Widera

Comments

Anonymous said…
A young social worker in LTC was once shocked, when I ordered a vibrator for a resident to use it instead of banana.
Since then I do discuss sexuality more often with my AL and LTC patients but definitely shy away from it if I admit pts to skilled nursing bed. I also lack the discussion in patients I did inherit from other physicians.
Anonymous said…
as a palliative care NP I routinely ask about their sexual activity, it is too important to let this go at the end of life, there is so much one can still do and participate in with a caring partner.
Anonymous said…
We try to teach the medical students to ask all older adults a sexual history...but how many of us actually comply? Definitely an important part of the geriatric assessment.
Anonymous said…
It happens all the time. As a social worker in LTC facilities I have had many different "issues" come up. Mostly dealing with the children of the resident not thinking it is right even in cases where both partners are widowed. It is a part of life, we are born sexual and die sexual.
tadalafil said…
http://www.TADALAFIL.CO
Anonymous said…
comprehensive med school curriculum for talking about sexuality: Ms. C, do you have sex with men, women, or both?
Dan Matlock said…
I have never brought up sexuality with a patient with ALS on a ventilator. It's like checking the PSA, what do you do with the results...?
Dan Matlock said…
I have never brought up sexuality with a patient with ALS on a ventilator. It's like checking the PSA, what do you do with the results...?

Popular posts from this blog

Lost in Translation: Google’s Translation of Palliative Care to ‘Do-Nothing Care’

by: Cynthia X. Pan, MD, FACP, AGSF (@Cxpan5X)

My colleagues often ask me: “Why are Chinese patients so resistant to hospice and palliative care?” “Why are they so unrealistic?” “Don’t they understand that death is part of life?” “Is it true that with Chinese patients you cannot discuss advance directives?”

As a Chinese speaking geriatrician and palliative care physician practicing in Flushing, NY, I have cared for countless Chinese patients with serious illnesses or at end of life.  Invariably, when Chinese patients or families see me, they ask me if I speak Chinese. When I reply “I do” in Mandarin, the relief and instant trust I see on their faces make my day meaningful and worthwhile.

At my hospital, the patient population is about 30% Asian, with the majority of these being Chinese. Most of these patients require language interpretation.  It becomes an interesting challenge and opportunity, as we often need to discuss advance directives, goals of care, and end of life care options…

Elderhood: Podcast with Louise Aronson

In this week's podcast we talk with Louise Aronson MD, MFA, Professor of Geriatrics at UCSF about her new book Elderhood, available for purchase now for delivery on the release date June 11th.

We are one of the first to interview Louise, as she has interviews scheduled with other lesser media outlets to follow (CBS This Morning and Fresh Air with Terry...somebody).

This book is tremendously rich, covering a history of aging/geriatrics, Louise's own journey as a geriatrician facing burnout, aging and death of family of Louise's members, insightful stories of patients, and more.

We focus therefore on the 3 main things we think our listeners and readers will be interested in.

First - why the word "Elder" and "Elderhood" when JAGS/AGS and others recently decided that the preferred terminology was "older adult"?

Second - Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969 - where do we see ageism in contemporary writing/thinking?  We focus on Louise's…

Psychedelics: Podcast with Ira Byock

In this week's podcast, we talk with Dr. Ira Byock, a leading palliative care physician, author, and public advocate for improving care through the end of life.

Ira Byock wrote a provocative and compelling paper in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management titled, "Taking Psychedelics Seriously."

In this podcast we challenge Ira Byock about the use of psychedelics for patients with serious and life-limiting illness.   Guest host Josh Biddle (UCSF Palliative care fellow) asks, "Should clinicians who prescribe psychedelics try them first to understand what their patient's are going through?" The answer is "yes" -- read or listen on for more!

While you're reading, I'll just go over and lick this toad.

-@AlexSmithMD





You can also find us on Youtube!



Listen to GeriPal Podcasts on:
iTunes Google Play MusicSoundcloudStitcher
Transcript
Eric: Welcome to the GeriPal Podcast. This is Eric Widera.

Alex: This is Alex Smith.

Eric: Alex, I spy someone in our …