Skip to main content

Forging the Future of Geriatrics and Palliative Care


This month the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society is e-publishing ahead of print a special article you should read, “Report of the Geriatrics – Hospice and Palliative Medicine Work Group: American Geriatrics Society and American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Leadership Collaboration.”

In 2009, the leadership of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), and the John A. Hartford Foundation brought together leaders in geriatrics and hospice and palliative medicine to identify areas of synergy between the two subspecialties and to work together in areas of common interest. While regular readers of GeriPal should have no problem articulating the overlap between the two specialties, the article nicely summarizes similarities and differences and includes a nice figure adapted from Sean Morrison which will be a great visual resource for presentations (see Figure 1 in the article.)

Focus groups were held in 2009 at the Annual meetings of the AAHPM and AGS and the work group then summarized the key areas of focus in areas of workforce, research, education, policy, and communication to members. Then, at a retreat the leadership of the organizations came to consensus on the following initiatives and recommendations:

Workforce

(1) Continued dialogue between the leadership of both subspecialties on ways to train mid-career providers since fellowship training will not meet workforce needs
(2) Better understanding of the current workforce issues in hospice and palliative medicine and geriatrics through incorporation of questions into the AGS annual workforce study and the proposed academic hospice and palliative medicine survey and communication of these findings to both organizations
(3) Identification of areas of resistance to collaboration between both subspecialties
(4) Delineation of unique and overlapping competencies for both subspecialties
(5) Support by both organizations for Geriatric Academic Career Awards and Palliative Academic Career Awards

Research

(1) Joint advocacy for research in advanced illness / multimorbidity / symptom burden and symptom management in older adults
(2) Increased communication to relevant stakeholders regarding the vacuum in geriatrics / hospice and palliative medicine research
(3) Initiation of a joint strategic initiative to increase funding in these areas through NIH State of the Art conferences, potential Institute of Medicine conferences for targeted topics, and interaction by the workgroup together with other AGS/AAHPM leaders and key research and policy stakeholders

Education

(1) An exhibit booth exchange during both Annual Meetings allowing each organization to have a presence at the other’s national conference
(2) Development of a pre-conference session at both the AGS and AAHPM conferences
(3) Discount offerings of educational materials to memberships (AGS has provided Geriatrics at Your Fingertips to AAHPM members at the AGS member price, and AAHPM has provided the Primer for Palliative Care to AGS members at the AAHPM member price)

Policy

(1) Confer (and hopefully concur!) on matters of mutual clinical and policy import
(2) Share policy and advocacy initiatives regularly to highlight areas of mutual interest and emphasis
(3) Share “talking points” related to (2)
(4) Prepare statements and political approaches to “hot button” issues, including but not limited to rationing, healthcare reform, end-of-life care, Medicare cost-cutting initiatives
(5) Share mechanisms of mobilizing membership to accomplish shared goals of the AAHPM and AGS

Communication to Memberships

(1) Ongoing communication between both organizations’ members and leaders regarding collaboration of the two organizations
(2) Regular updates in the AGS and AAHPM newsletters
(3) Development of a joint position statement and issue brief addressing the need for integration of geriatric and hospice and palliative medicine, the importance of funding the care provided, and the need for training programs that facilitate training at the intersection of the fields


The working group in a letter to the editors of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management acknowledge that it would be helpful to include other disciplines such as nursing (and I would add the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA!)) but this is a great first step. Be sure to thank both organizations for their work on this, and offer to help out.

And be sure to mark your calendars:

  • The Geriatrics SIG at AAHPM’s meeting is scheduled to meet Thursday March 8, 2012 from 5:30 PM – 6:30 PM
  • The Long-Term Care SIG at AAHPM’s meeting is scheduled to meet Friday March 8, 2012 from 4:45 PM – 5:45 PM
  • The Palliative Care SIG session at AGS’s meeting is scheduled for Thursday May 03, 2012 at 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM


by: Paul Tatum (@doctatum)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dangers of Fleet Enemas

The dangers of oral sodium phosphate preparations are fairly well known in the medical community. In 2006 the FDA issued it’s first warning that patients taking oral sodium phosphate preparations are at risk for potential for acute kidney injury. Two years later, over-the-counter preparations of these drugs were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturers.  Those agents still available by prescription were given black box warnings mainly due to acute phosphate nephropathy that can result in renal failure, especially in older adults. Despite all this talk of oral preparations, little was mentioned about a sodium phosphate preparation that is still available over-the-counter – the Fleet enema.

Why Oral Sodium Phosphate Preparations Are Dangerous 

Before we go into the risks of Fleet enemas, lets spend just a couple sentences on why oral sodium phosphate preparations carry significant risks. First, oral sodium phosphate preparations can cause significant fluid shifts within the colon …

Dying without Dialysis

There is a terrific article in this weeks Journal of Pain and Symptom Management by Fliss Murtagh of King's College in London about the epidemiology of symptoms for patients with advanced renal failure who die without dialysis.  This study is important because while we know that patients with advanced renal failure have a limited life expectancy and the average age of initiation of hemodialysis is increasing, we know little about the alternatives to hemodialysis.  Specifically, we know nothing about symptoms affecting quality of life among patients who elect not to start dialysis (so called "conservative management" - is this the best label?).  This article provides a terrific counterpoint to the article in last years NEJM showing that nursing home residents who initiated hemodialysis tended to die and decline in function (see GeriPal write up here). 

The study authors followed patients with the most advanced form of chronic kidney disease (the new name for renal failu…

Survival from severe sepsis: The infection is cured but all is not well

Severe sepsis is a syndrome marked by a severe infection that results in the failure of at least one major organ system: For example, pneumonia complicated by kidney failure. It is the most common non-cardiac cause of critical illness and is associated with a high mortality rate.

But what happens to those who survive their hospitalization for severe sepsis? An important study published in JAMA from Iwashyna and colleagues provides answers and tells us all is not well. When the patient leaves the hospital, the infection may be cured, but the patient and family will need to contend with a host of major new functional and cognitive deficits.

Iwashyna examined disability and cognitive outcomes among 516 survivors of severe sepsis. These subjects were Medicare enrollees who were participants in the Health and Retirement Study. The average age of patients was 77 years.

When interviewed after discharge, most survivors were left with major new deficits in their ability to live independently. …